Yamaha Piccolo Headjoint Options
15:28 on Sunday, June 19, 2005
|
|
|
(Guest)
|
Hello everyone. Im about to purchase a piccolo and i think ive decided on a yamaha ypc-32. But i have a question. The headjoint is just nickel plated, do any of you know if i could purchase a solid silver headjoint use that instead? Just curious. And if any of you own or have played the ypc-32, what do you think? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Re: Yamaha Piccolo Headjoint Options
17:25 on Sunday, June 19, 2005
|
|
|
(Arak)
|
According to the catalogues (in English) from Japan, YPC-32 has a SILVER plated head.
It is inlikely that another brand will have the same diameter tenon.
You buy the head for a YPV-82, which is sterling silver, but this head is likely to cost more than a `32` entire piccolo, and it possibly has different bore and embouchure characteristics of teh rest of the piccolo.
May I ask, why are you so upset by the silver plating?
I would expect a plated head to sound identical to a solid silver head, ALL other things being equal.
To quality instrumnets do not need to be solid silver to make a great sound. Yamaha acknowledges that by making their highly-respected alto flute from brass.
|
|
|
|
Re: Yamaha Piccolo Headjoint Options
18:38 on Sunday, June 19, 2005
|
|
|
(KC)
|
I while back I had a chance to put a solid silver head on the 32. I believe the head came off of an 82. I did a blind test and tried the silver one and then the solid silver one and to my suprise, I nor anyone else around me was able to tell the difference between the two.
It is not worth the extra cost to upgrade in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Re: Yamaha Piccolo Headjoint Options
20:45 on Sunday, June 19, 2005
|
|
|
(Arak)
|
Nice to hear that. It supports what I have been saying about head joint material.
The BODY of the 80 & 90 series are likely to differ significantly from that of the 32 (& 62)in the meticulous undercutting of tone holes, but the heads themselves may well be identical except for the bass metal.
|
|
|
|
Re: Yamaha Piccolo Headjoint Options
21:23 on Sunday, June 19, 2005
|
|
|
(KC)
|
They did look pretty identical to me.
|
|
|
|
|