Pearl flute review
Pearl flute review
01:28 on Monday, March 20, 2006
|
|
|
StephenK (395 points)
|
Curiosity got the best of me and I picked up a Pearl-505RBE to see how different offset is with open holes and how the split-E would effect playing.
On offset-open holes I experienced no odd transition or inability to switch back an forth between inline and offset open holes so that's nice to know.
On split-E... dear lord it's amazing how much added weight this little mechanism adds and it didn't really seem to do much at first really. I switched between flutes E's and A's to see if I felt any more secure and I didn't really notice anything. It wasn't until I tried playing "lazily" that I noticed it's cool effect. It could offer crack protection for those moments when you don't expect it. There IS a timbre difference, but it really is negligible and after playing with it for awhile I seem to have adjusted for the split-E and I rather like the sound now. It’s been a few days, but it doesn’t appear to affect my ability to hit high E’s on my other flute.
The Pearl PH-5J headjoint.... SUCKS... Oh my dear lord it appears to be on autopilot. The thing has absolutely no resistance and produces only a sickening sweet tone (well it's a lovely sweet tone, but I don't like "sweet"). Absolutely no lower range projection capability or “edge”.
The flute itself is nice. The scale is good. The mechanism functions very well. There are obvious signs of plating when you look closely at the keys though, wrinkling at edges even inside the hole of the open hole key. The tube and the tone holes have no plating issues at all though. It's interesting that the entire flute inside and out is silverplated or the alloy that they use is silver colored in nature, the tenons are certainly a different hue.
I like the reversed gizmo key. Gives more room for the fingers to move around down there, but I don’t like that I cannot easily slide from low Eb to low C. I’ll need to see what I can do about that.
The Bb/thumb key is nicely designed as well. Appears to allow easier switching between each.
The French case the flute came in was an EL CHEAPO case that smelled of glue. Hideous. There was even a little piece of cloth that was glued in place that covered the headjoint somewhat that I couldn’t understand why they would do such a thing as it got in the way of taking out the headjoint, but I noticed it that the G# is actually making contact with the headjoint in this case… the fabric being a barrier. Horrid horrid design. Thankfully I have a couple spare cases.
The French case is also non-standard. It is French width and height, but American length. So the case cover which is actually decent can only fit this case or another non-standard case like Gemeinhardt’s French case… lol now I finally have a cover for that case!
All in all… the flute is good, but the headjoint and case are bad. I would purchase this flute with the intention of headjoint shopping to end up with a better flute. I hope the head joint cut on this Quantz flute isn’t the same across the board. If this flute body is the same across the board then getting this flute with its silver plated head and upgrading the head would be a very worthwhile investment.
I purchased this flute used for $400… a couple weeks used. So it was a good purchase.
But considering this flute is $700 from fluteworld and $600 from WwandBW… Yamaha’s student flute is probably a better buy as you will get a decent headjoint with the flute... and it usually can be found new for around $500-600 (Though no split-E's).
Now I did get my Natsuki head fitted to the Pearl flute and with the change in head it could rival a Yamaha flute, but you're talking about an $800 head upgrade.
I also restored my Gemeinhardt headjoint and I found the good ol’ model J to be a better player than the Pearl head. Cost me a pretty penny to restore that sucker, but it was worth it.
I’ll attach a recording of my Gemeinhardt now back in one piece shortly since I was actually suprised that my Gemeinhardt seems to be sounding better as of late now that it has competition. lol.
|
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
01:54 on Monday, March 20, 2006
|
|
|
Account Closed (3248 points)
|
Thanks for the write up on that. I think I know who you got that flute from. Nice guy!
I had the Quantz 665 RBE model for about a month to use as a backup while I was trying to sell my Muramatsu on consignment.
I thought the scale was very nice on it and the headjoint was pretty decent. I really think that the scale on them are a lot better then the one on the Yamaha flutes personally.
When I played the one I had, it was lacking robust to the sound and sounded kind of tinny sounding to me. I put an Emanuel headjoint on it and that helped out a lot with that.
I ended up selling it and using my student Yamaha because the sound just could not be beat.
I am always fooling around getting different flutes to see if it might be 'the one' that will stand out to me that I can use as a backup, but so far my little Yamaha 221 has beaten them all, even the all solid silver flutes that I have tried. It just works well for me. Too bad Yamaha can't change their scale though. That is the only draw back, but I can work with it.
I took the split E off of the Pearl that I had. I just don't like them at all. It makes that E sound very muffled to me.
All in all, I thought the mechanism was very fluid on the Peal that I had and comfortable. I just didn't care for the sound much. I tend a be a bit spoiled now though, and I am used to handmade models and headjoints, so when I pick up a student line flute it just doesn't cut it for me anymore. The only one, like I said before that does, is my 221.
I didn't think that the cases were that bad. Did yours come in a green lined case? I thought that they were pretty nice, myself.
Now you are going to have to make a recording on it, so we can hear it Stephen. <Added>I didn't notice much of a weight differnce with the split E, but I do know that Pearl uses that extra stabalizer bar, so maybe that is adding weight too. The flute seemed pretty light to me. That was a big plus to me. I like silver plated flutes because of that.
|
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
12:25 on Monday, March 20, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
22:39 on Monday, March 20, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
22:43 on Monday, March 20, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
03:52 on Tuesday, March 21, 2006
|
|
|
Account Closed (3248 points)
|
Though another problem with this flute is that you cannot just lay it down. The thumb post is positioned in such a way that the flute rests on it and the G# key. |
|
I noticed the same thing on a Jupiter flute that I sold not too long ago. The thumb post seemed to be a bit longer then most.
The Pearl that I had felt rather light to me, but then again I am used to an all solid silver Powell with a C# trill key and an offset G. My Powell tends to run on the heavier side.
If you do find a scale to weigh it on, I would be really interested in your findings.
|
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
19:30 on Tuesday, March 21, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
08:46 on Wednesday, March 22, 2006
|
|
|
Dennis (587 points)
|
I now have to chime in. First off: The HJ you had...5J...were those the only characters in the name? I play on my first headjoint from pearl - PH-5JSL. I LOVE this headjoint. It has a great timbre in the low notes, and plays comfortable in all ranges. I had the flute "tweaked" when I got it. Kara, I did notice that the Split-E sounded a bit muffled, BUT after I took it to the doctor, I found that the split-E felt on the crutch had condensed...so the key itself (lower G) was not closing all the way. After altering that a bit...PERFECT Split-E. I really also don't feel the weight difference everyone is speaking about. That could also be because of the fact that I owned a pearl flute previous to this. I have a PF-521 which has offset, split-e, b-foot, silver plated everything, and a solid silver lip plate. Now I have a 665-RBECODA which has offset, slipt-e, b-foot, C# trill, D# roller (which is what Stephen needs to change to for the Eb to C movement), and it is silver plated with a solid silver head with a 10K solid gold lip plate. I feel no difference in them. I do have to say that getting it looked over by someone else (sorry Kara as I know you do repair work) helped me immensely. I played on it for a month before taking it in. I was like...it's my playing...I suck! That's why I could play anything well. Well, come to find out it plays very perfectly now. As far as the thumb mechanism...I love it. It is really easy to switch back and forth. The G# key...eh...I think the reason you say it's designed so badly is the fact that it was designed to play...not to lay on table. That's what they make flute stands for. Pearl is a very good company. Something I could not say about any of the Jupiter Flutes I tried before re-settling on a Pearl. The headjoint that came with the 665RBECODA I have is model PH-610J. I hate it. There is too much of a fine line between resistance and cracking. Therefore, I use my 5JSL still. One day I will upgrade again. I also have to note that the Pearl Flutes start blowing people out of the water when you get to the REAL Quantz Series, and then the Coda-Quantz and up. Listen to Rhonda Larson sometime. She plays on a 14K Gold Maesta with an 18K gold head. Of course I will not be able to afford this for a very long time, but her tone is a dream! That's all for now. Thanks!
-Dennis
<Added>
OOPS! I meant...That's why I COULDN'T play anything well!
|
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
17:13 on Wednesday, March 22, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
17:52 on Wednesday, March 22, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
21:21 on Wednesday, March 22, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
23:10 on Wednesday, March 22, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
01:25 on Thursday, March 23, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
01:35 on Thursday, March 23, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Pearl flute review
06:09 on Thursday, March 23, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|