Really odd review...
09:47 on Friday, October 6, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Really odd review...
13:09 on Friday, October 6, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Really odd review...
13:50 on Friday, October 6, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Really odd review...
17:51 on Friday, October 6, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Really odd review...
18:11 on Friday, October 6, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Really odd review...
03:22 on Saturday, October 7, 2006
|
|
|
jose_luis (2369 points)
|
"I'm just struck by the apparent sincerity of this guy".
So do I. My problem could be that I tend to believe in what people says, even on Internet (very dangerous, I know...)
I do not have the experience to compare flute bodies of sterling silver with silvered brass instruments. You profesional, of course have it.
The review is strange (IMHO) in that it attributes a better sound to a homogeneous (metal wise) instrument.
Could it be that he was confused by the (normally) higher quality, due to its higher price, of full silver instruments?
I know that 9x percent of sound quality comes from the headjoint, but, could a better, more careful manufacture and adjustment, possibly inherent(?) to a higher priced silver body play a role in this comparison?
When I first played on my new silver Yamaha 674 (after 3 years with my Gemeinhardt M3) the sound difference was so important I could not believe it. One thing I noticed was the "vibration" of the flute body. I could feel it on my fingers. I had never exerienced that with the old instrument.
I believed the YFL had a thinner tube wall, but after some measurements (i.e quite difficult) with a digital caliper they appear to be very similar (around 0,32mm) The body weights are also very similar; in fact the YFL is 10 grams heavier than GMH, in spite of having open holes.
|
|
|
|
Re: Really odd review...
06:24 on Saturday, October 7, 2006
|
|
|
|