Gemeinhardt vs. Yamaha( headjoints)
Gemeinhardt vs. Yamaha( headjoints)
17:39 on Sunday, October 8, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Gemeinhardt vs. Yamaha( headjoints)
18:40 on Sunday, October 8, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Gemeinhardt vs. Yamaha( headjoints)
18:50 on Sunday, October 8, 2006
|
|
|
JButky (657 points)
|
Obviously, I find the Yam. headj. gives a better response( not airy) than the Gem. headj.(airy) Is this because of undercutting or do other factors come into play. Also, the yamaha headj. is a tad bit loose, but is it possible these days to take it and get the part where the head goes to the body plated or something like that to fix the looseness? Sorry this is so long! |
|
The airiness may partially be a result of undercutting deficiencies or a raised burr on the North wall...(very common, very easy to fix) The Yamaha and Gemeinhardt are two radically different tapers..The hole geometry is also radically different.
Luckily, there is enough material on the Gemeinhardt to make it play a lot better with some knowledgeable hole fixing..
But you need to take it to someone who knows what they are doing.
Making the headjoint fit if a little loose is a piece of cake. Almost any reputable technician can do that for you.
$100 for a repad? Sheesh...
Joe B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|