New head joint.
00:26 on Thursday, December 7, 2006
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
02:07 on Thursday, December 7, 2006
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
21:39 on Thursday, December 7, 2006
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
13:44 on Friday, December 8, 2006
|
|
|
Tibbiecow (480 points)
|
Most headjoints will be a slightly different fit, whether smaller or larger. A small adjustment can be managed by just about any band instrument tech, to get the fit perfect. If the fit will be a bigger adjustment, you might have to find a specialist to fit it.
While the FIT of almost any headjoint can be adjusted to fit almost any flute, it must be said that some headjoints do not complement some flutes.
Flutist06 is exactly right; different headjoints will suit different people. Try several, and see which you find has the best tone, response/articulation, low range, etc.
A Gemeinhardt headjoint will be fairly easily fitted to a Gemeinhardt flute- and you CAN put a new headjoint into an older student flute; this is a much cheaper upgrade option than a whole new flute. The sound comes from the headjoint, and there's usually not much good reason to pay for the open holes and B-foot anyway- provided that your flute body is in good condition.
It would probably be worh your time to try out other headjoints, such as Yamaha and Jupiter which will be easily available. Pro headjoints can be found used for a pretty reasonable cost, although you always want to try one before you buy it. Any hand-cut headjoint will have a slightly unique character- every one is a little different. So if you fall in love with, say, your friend's Miyazawa MZ-5 cut headjoint, be prepared to try several other MZ-5's before you find the right one. And you might find that an MZ-6 fits you better!
|
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
00:17 on Saturday, December 9, 2006
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
00:18 on Saturday, December 9, 2006
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
00:41 on Saturday, December 9, 2006
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
01:56 on Sunday, December 10, 2006
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
02:06 on Sunday, December 10, 2006
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
03:16 on Sunday, December 10, 2006
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
04:23 on Sunday, December 10, 2006
|
|
|
StephenK (395 points)
|
http://www.burkart.com/faq.htm?sid=0001UegyjQFFFSEsQU0x402
Boehm determined empirically that 19mm was an optimum inner diameter for the C flute long ago. Some of us flutemakers have experimented with 19.5mm and 20mm since then, but the vast majority of flutes today use 19mm. By the way, 19mm equals 0.748 inch (just short of 3/4" which is the diameter of a penny! That means that you can use a penny to gauge the bore of your headjoint or your flute body and compare it to others! Just make sure you don't push it in so far you can't retrieve it.
What varies is the wall thickness. So the inner diameters are the same, but the outer diameters are not. Hence, a different headjoint may be loose, fit just right, or not go into your flute barrel. A machinist, toolmaker, or flutemaker can measure your flute to tell you what the wall thickness is and what the inner diameter of your barrel joint is. With that information, there are quite a few flutemakers and headjoint makers who would be happy to send you headjoints on trial. The more skillful ones will make sure that the position of the embouchure hole and taper of the tube are appropriate for your instrument. |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
10:21 on Monday, December 11, 2006
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
11:57 on Monday, December 11, 2006
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
17:38 on Monday, December 11, 2006
|
|
|
Flutist06 (1545 points)
|
I phrased as I did about Yamaha and other makes for the specific reason that I was not sure about the plating. They may very well do this, but I have not heard anything about it, so until I see some evidence that they do, I choose not to believe. Notice that I did not say "Yamaha does not plate over their silver heads." I save concrete statements for things I know are factual, and more open-ended ones for things that are my opinion or aren't fully substantiated. As for destroying the head, I meant "destroy the playing characteristics of the head." It should not obliterate the head itself (reducing it to a pile of scrap or something like that), but significant resizing can affect how the head plays. I've experienced this first hand, even when the resizing was performed by an *excellent* tech. As for ruining the plate layer around the tenon, I also included the word "may," indicating that there are circumstances where it could happen, as well as circumstances where it won't. Say a tech was using sub-par tools that weren't smooth, or didn't ujse a lubricant, or the tech is just not as skilled as you...Then the plating could be ruined, as I said. I'm sorry if my post caused confusion or aggravation. Your expertise in this area is precisely why I mentioned that you and Joe would probably be able to post more accurately and fully on the situation.
|
|
|
|
Re: New head joint.
17:42 on Monday, December 11, 2006
|
|
|
StephenK (395 points)
|
There is only so much metal to scrape off before you reach the other side.
Alternative methods involve modifying the bore taper which not only devalues a headjoint (generally visible to the naked eye) or the flutes range and timbre can be negatively affected from the modified taper.
Regards,
Stephen
|
|
|
|
|