Re: B-foot in perspective
22:30 on Friday, February 23, 2007
|
|
|
kozafluitmusique (115 points)
|
Posted by kozafluitmusique
I have a C foot...and proud!
I went to a camp where I was the only upgraded C foot. It felt odd when the flute choir I was in had a low B and had to speak up about it...
And I played second part of an arrangement (for a flute choir thing at school) of "Handel: Arrival of the Queen of Sheba" (sp?) and it had a B (it's because it was originally for violin, I think)...I wasn't the only one who had to speak up, thank goodness.
|
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
03:54 on Saturday, February 24, 2007
|
|
|
jose_luis (2369 points)
|
Tibbiecow, the instrument the sonatas were originally written for, is confusing.
They could be for Oboe, string or flute /recorder.
The leaflet in a commercial CD I have says the Opus 1, a kind of pastiche published by Thomas Walsh in 1730 had works "for the treble recorder or the oboe, but usually the choice of solo instrument was left open". i.e in the German edition I mentioned before, there are works said to be for Querfloete (our flute) and for Blockfloete (the recorder).
The Sonata Op1 Nr 1b, with the low B, is marked as being for Querfloete.
Whatever the original instrument was, the interesting thing is that this old edition (1955) already has the B low. There is no mention that an Alto flute is required (or a B foot). Was the B foot so widely available at that time (1955)as is today? I do not think so.
for all:
I am considering buying a C foot for my Yamaha YFL674. I could either keep or sell the present B foot. (most probably keep it). But, how can I be sure the new C foot receiver will fit in the body tenon? How do you change these parts (short of testing them directly, something I will probably not be able to do if I buy in USA)?
Does anybody have a C foot suitable for this instrument to offer?
|
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
13:40 on Sunday, February 25, 2007
|
|
|
Tibbiecow (480 points)
|
Jose-Luis,
I know that Liz of Winds 101 had an ad running last year in usedflutes.com. She was asking if anyone had a B-foot to trade in for a C-foot. She had several Yamaha 400 series flutes with C-foot, and her customers wanted a B-foot, so was looking for any available trades. As far as I know, a C-foot from the Yamaha 500 series and up should work just fine. It may take a small amount of fitting. If you need to have it fitted, you have to realize that your B-foot may not work anymore without teflon tape on the tenon- or at all, if the fitting is 'the other way around'.
Also, you can order just the footjoint from any Yamaha dealer, but they are expensive, especialy if they are silver with pointed keys. (The Yam. 400 C-foot would likely fit, and is silver tube, but the keys are not pointed and would not match the other keys on the flute, if this matters to you.)
You may be able to find (really cheap) a C-foot from a Yamaha 200 series- it would be plated tube and keys, but the price would be right, and it would play just fine.
|
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
14:58 on Sunday, February 25, 2007
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
16:37 on Sunday, February 25, 2007
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
22:49 on Sunday, February 25, 2007
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
07:18 on Monday, February 26, 2007
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
14:22 on Monday, February 26, 2007
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
14:45 on Monday, February 26, 2007
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
15:20 on Monday, February 26, 2007
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
16:22 on Monday, February 26, 2007
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
16:09 on Wednesday, February 28, 2007
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
16:44 on Wednesday, February 28, 2007
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
17:18 on Wednesday, February 28, 2007
|
|
|
Account Closed (3248 points)
|
Jose, you might be interested in this:
http://www.robinsonflutes.com/6.html
Angie gave me a C foot and I have been using it for the past four days and loving it! I also pluged up the holes with those Powell plugos and my hands are thanking me now. Comfort is the fasion for me.
|
|
|
|
Re: B-foot in perspective
17:53 on Wednesday, February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|