Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
15:55 on Saturday, August 25, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
16:07 on Saturday, August 25, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
18:24 on Saturday, August 25, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
14:17 on Monday, August 27, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
17:12 on Monday, August 27, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
18:25 on Monday, August 27, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
19:20 on Monday, August 27, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
07:03 on Tuesday, August 28, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
22:45 on Thursday, August 30, 2007
|
|
|
Flutist06 (1545 points)
|
Well, now that any discussion of Valgon rings and Foster extensions has died down, I thought I'd give my $.02...
When it comes to the rings, I can't say I buy the marketing jibberish about WHY Valgon rings work, but they certainly seem to have an impact. After some blind testing of the Valgon rings (including among the testers a college professor, several of her students, a recording artist from out CA way, and myself), the consensus seems to be that they definitely change the feel of the flute for the player (most reported feeling some increase in resistance), but perhaps more importantly, they can make subtle differences to the sound, and oddly enough, effect projection (the college professor described it as making the player seem as if they had portable acoustic shells around them that just shot the sound out to the audience). They're really rather neat little gadgets,though they certainly aren't suitable for every instance.I would think as a soloist or in a chamber setting, they could be very useful.
As for the Foster extensions, I was far less impressed, though there was a subtle difference there too, mostly in where the sound seemed to originate (it seemed to move the sound off to the right of the player). If it weren't for the $700 price tag, I would be far more willing to experiment with them, but as it is, I don't consider them particularly useful or impressive.
|
|
|
|
Re: Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
23:15 on Thursday, August 30, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
23:52 on Thursday, August 30, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Valgon Rings and Foster Extensions
11:59 on Tuesday, August 5, 2008
|
|
|
tsukiyofluteplay er
|
Posted by tsukiyofluteplayer
I haven't heard much about the Valgon Rings but I have had the chance to try a Foster Extension at a convention. I also visited Carolyn Nussbaum at the Albuquerque convention and was able to try the extensions in a private room. To be honest, it really just depends on the player on whether you should purchase one or not.
I found that I had an increase in projection, especially in the low register. Consequently,with the extension, playing softly in the low register it was easier to keep the notes from going flat. Also, if you are going to experiment, I would suggest trying different combos. I only tried silver extensions, but many endorse using one of each or two of the same metal. For me, personally, I didn't feel the need to purchase the extension, but if I had more money, it would be a nice addition to my flute collection.
Also, the price of the silver extension is actually $300 according to their website. I think that was the introductory price, but the gold extension definitely went up due to the rise in gold prices. The website is www.flute4u.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|