Re: Wooden flutes ...

    
Re: Wooden flutes ...    23:06 on Monday, December 3, 2007          

atoriphile
(254 points)
Posted by atoriphile

I'm surprised --- I really thought wooden flutes would be less expensive.


If you make a mistake making a metal flute, you can always melt it down and start over. That's not the case with wooden flutes.

Let me state again that I think most flutes are made of metal because it is a lot easier to work with than wood (and a lot easier to mass produce!).


Re: Wooden flutes ...    11:23 on Tuesday, December 4, 2007          

Account Closed
(324 points)
Posted by Account Closed

Micron:

I've seen wooden flutes wherein the embouchure hole was "cut" into the head-joint.

I've also seen wooden flutes that had (I'm guessing) silver embouchure plates?

Just wondered if (either) plays any part on what you addressed above?

Thanks. Jim


Re: Wooden flutes ...    18:59 on Tuesday, December 4, 2007          

Account Closed
(324 points)
Posted by Account Closed

Thank you, Micron:

That answers my question and I appreciate it.

Regards, Jim


Re: Wooden flutes ...    20:00 on Tuesday, December 4, 2007          
Re: Wooden flutes ...    10:37 on Wednesday, December 5, 2007          

Account Closed
(324 points)
Posted by Account Closed

Thank you for the links, Pletko!

Jim


Re: Wooden flutes ...    15:54 on Wednesday, December 5, 2007          

dio
(68 points)
Posted by dio

Back to Boehm's preferences.

1846 --- He experiments with different metals, decides on silver for the best tone quality and least fatiguing to play.


According to Folkers & Powell, Boehm changed his preference from all silver, to all wood, to silver body with wood headjoint.

See Theobald Boehm headjoint description on the following web page.

http://www.headjoints.com/


Re: Wooden flutes ...    13:57 on Thursday, December 6, 2007          

Account Closed
(324 points)
Posted by Account Closed

Thank you for your up-date and link, dio.

Best Regards, Jim


Re: Wooden flutes ...    15:05 on Thursday, December 6, 2007          

Plekto
(423 points)
Posted by Plekto

This makes sense, when you think about it. I used to play clarinet years ago and a common problem with wood instruments is that they really only last about 10-15 years at most before they begin to suffer from the bore getting out of round and other problems. Talk to any professional clarinet or oboe player and they'll say that sometimes it's only a few years before the thing gets "played out" and needs to be replaced or have a major overhaul.

So, while wood may sound better, it's a very very poor choice for the main body of an instrument. For a headjoint, though, it's perfect. You get the sound you want and yes, it lasts a decade or so and then needs to be replaced, but the body is still as good as new most likely. Instead of replacing the worn out wood flute, you only replace the $800-$1000 or so headjoint.

Note - this is for professional level use. An older wood clarinet or flute/headjoint is still good for practice and such for well beyond its "optimal" period.

<Added>

http://www.naylors-woodwind-repair.com/Grenadilla.htm

A good article on the problems and solutions to wood care in instruments. As you can see, metal has a near total lack of any of these issues, which is why it is popular in flutes.


Re: Wooden flutes ...    16:17 on Thursday, December 6, 2007          

Account Closed
(324 points)
Posted by Account Closed

Nice feed-back, Pletko.

Thanks for the info and the link.

Jim


   








This forum: Older: Gold Risers on flutes?
 Newer: pearl piccolo age