Opinions and preferences

    
Opinions and preferences    05:47 on Friday, February 8, 2008          

dionisp
(17 points)
Posted by dionisp

Hi all,

This is my first post in the forum and I seek your opinions on specific Japanese flutes.
What would you prefer between Altus 1707, Miyazawa Type II Muramatsu SR and Mateki 06?
I know that I should play each one and I am planning to do that. However, it would be great if you can share some impressions if you have experience with these instruments.

Cheers.


Re: Opinions and preferences    09:28 on Friday, February 8, 2008          

Account Closed
(3248 points)
Posted by Account Closed

I like Muramatsu and Miyazawa.


Re: Opinions and preferences    10:18 on Friday, February 8, 2008          

CatMan
(133 points)
Posted by CatMan

Welcome to the board!

Of the models you listed, I only have played the Altus. I thought it was an excellent flute and I have nothing bad to say about it. I have a Muramatsu GX that I think is a supurb flute, but I don't know how it compares to the Muramatsu SR you referred to. In general, Muramatsu flutes certainly have a good reputation. (Of course, I'll admit to possibly being just a wee bit prejudiced!


Re: Opinions and preferences    11:03 on Friday, February 8, 2008          

Patrick
(1743 points)
Posted by Patrick

see if you can try them blindfolded, also try them in a room with good accoustics as well as a very dry room...see what feels best..


Re: Opinions and preferences    03:57 on Monday, February 11, 2008          

dionisp
(17 points)
Posted by dionisp

Thanks all for replies.

Allieanie what's the prob with Muramatsu headjoints? I 've never heard complaints about that. Can you please elabolare?



Re: Opinions and preferences    20:24 on Monday, February 11, 2008          

Account Closed
(491 points)
Posted by Account Closed

theyre nice headjoints, but the cut is pretty standard and there isnt much variety (ex: miyazawa). it would be nice to see muramatsu offer a different cut of headjoint, especially a more modern cut. the tone that muramatsus are associated with are the old-school sounds. which is nice, dont get me wrong, but when you need to play a crisp, breezy passage in the low register (i had problems with a muddy low register with mine), i think that a head with a more square cut would be a more optimal choice.

mechanically, i think the muramatsu is one of the most sound flutes out there.

perhaps we can petition to muramatsu in japan to make them come up with another type of headjoint. it would be nice to have options.


Re: Opinions and preferences    05:56 on Tuesday, February 12, 2008          

dionisp
(17 points)
Posted by dionisp

Thank you all for the info. I will play some flutes and decide in the forthcoming month. I will let you know of my choice.


Re: Opinions and preferences    14:03 on Tuesday, February 12, 2008          

atoriphile
(254 points)
Posted by atoriphile

Muramatsu does have another model headjoint known as the Tsubasa head joint. It has "wings" that help to focus the sound and make the low and high register easier to play.

See the picture at http://www.muramatsu-america.com/images/Accessories/Tsubasa.png



Re: Opinions and preferences    15:31 on Tuesday, February 12, 2008          

Plekto
(423 points)
Posted by Plekto

Looks like a gimmick as good headjoints can be found that don't have it.

Muramatsu are very nice bodies. A lot of people have eventually gone the custom headjoint route anyways, so the main focus at the upper end should be on the body, IMO - it's unlikely that you'll keep the stock headjoint forever.


Re: Opinions and preferences    17:54 on Wednesday, February 13, 2008          

Account Closed
(491 points)
Posted by Account Closed

i mean a completely different cut. i dont like that headjoint, but i dont like wings. i like how miyazawa has many different cuts and i think muramatsu should also adapt that idea. or at least one other.


Re: Opinions and preferences    12:47 on Thursday, February 14, 2008          

Account Closed
(491 points)
Posted by Account Closed

i play out of the side of my mouth. it has an effect on my tone and its not necessarily a good one.

a question regarding the original topic: is there any particular reson why you are searching for a flute with soldered tone holes or is that just a coincidence?


Re: Opinions and preferences    14:23 on Thursday, February 14, 2008          

dionisp
(17 points)
Posted by dionisp

Nope! people keep telling me that soldered toneholes are a must if you are going to have a flute at this price range.


Re: Opinions and preferences    20:06 on Friday, February 15, 2008          

Account Closed
(491 points)
Posted by Account Closed

ive never noticed a difference between the two except a higher price tag. one is easier to have straubinger pads put on them (soldered) but i dont like straubingers anyway. i think perhaps if youre really serious about flute dont limit yourself to just soldered tone holes. you may find the flute of your dreams with drawns.


Re: Opinions and preferences    01:52 on Monday, February 18, 2008          

dionisp
(17 points)
Posted by dionisp

Interesting. To tell you the truth, I haven't noticed something different in the tone when I tested some soldered tonehole flutes. I'll keep that in mind because the price dif is pretty big.


Re: Opinions and preferences    11:01 on Monday, February 18, 2008          

Account Closed
(491 points)
Posted by Account Closed

some makers only make their flutes with soldered tone holes. ive noticed that to be extremely common with the american makers over the japanese makers. theyve been coming out with a "lower line" for less money without the soldered.

brannen vs. millenium series
burkart vs. burkart&phelan
powell vs. conservatory

yeah, you get the point.

and out of the flutes you listed, id still go with the muramatsu. i own one (the ds) and i absolutely love it. i do have a lillian burkart headjoint now instead of the standard one that came with it. ive never had any problems with it. in fact, i havent even taken it in for so much as a coa since ive owned it and ive owned it for almost 5 years. i definitely need to do that soon... i will say that im getting a leak in it now, but after 5 years of no tech touching it, i think its in great shape.
i almost bought a miyazawa when flute shopping. my sister owns one right now (parents just bought her one). she sounds great on it. but to be honest, she sounds much better on my flute.


   








This forum: Older: AVANTI FLUTE REVIEW!!
 Newer: pearl piccolo age