Re: Music College?
11:36 on Wednesday, March 12, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Music College?
11:41 on Wednesday, March 12, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Music College?
11:47 on Wednesday, March 12, 2008
|
|
|
Scotch (660 points)
|
All of my instructors were pricipal players for the local Symphonys....I guess the point I am trying to make is depending on location of the school, you can actually get some good instruction. |
|
You can, of course, get some good instruction, but I don't see that it has much to do with location--assuming you can reach it yourself. Members of major symphony orchestras (even last-desk second-violin members) are generally very good players, but that doesn't necessarily make them very good teachers, nor does any kind of performing distinction necessarily make any performer a good teacher. (I once took a jazz piano class, for example, from someone I consider one of the best jazz pianists around. He was also intelligent, well-rounded, and articulate, but somehow he didn't manage to teach much, and I didn't find the class very profitable. The main problems, I think, had to do with his lack of preparation, his assumption that he could get by on performing skill alone, and the circumstance that he wasn't at the time experienced at giving this sort of class.) It isn't always the case that music schools manage to find the best teachers, unfortunately, but as a general rule they try, and as general rule you're much better off with a "professional career teacher".
|
|
|
|
Re: Music College?
12:13 on Wednesday, March 12, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Music College?
13:14 on Wednesday, March 12, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Music College?
16:41 on Wednesday, March 12, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Music College?
20:08 on Wednesday, March 12, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Music College?
14:45 on Thursday, March 13, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Music College?
15:30 on Thursday, March 13, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Music College?
03:24 on Friday, March 14, 2008
|
|
|
Plekto (423 points)
|
Sorry - it's been busy the last few days...
What I meant by my comment was that "professional teachers" are exactly that - people who only teach music and don't do anything outside of teaching.
This quote a few posts back summed this up quite well:
(Obviously this is an opinion)- When looking at who and where they studied and when looking at what they have done and what they are doing now; |
|
If they are major players at local symphonies and so on, they ARE professionals who also teach in their spare time, or essentially live and work as such.(though it may appear that they spend far more time teaching, they'll almost always see themselves as a teacher second - heh)
As for your specific situation:
About the place that works off of endowments and is free, um.. go for it if you can. Free is always the major determiner, IME, if most other things are roughly similar.
|
|
|
|
Re: Music College?
05:06 on Saturday, March 15, 2008
|
|
|
Scotch (660 points)
|
What I meant by my comment was that "professional teachers" are exactly that - people who only teach music and don't do anything outside of teaching. |
|
Really? And where exactly is this species of animal to be found? (It seems to me the context was very clear: We are talking here about music school teachers. Most music school teachers are required to participate in regular faculty recitals--in addition to whatever other performing they may do.)
You seem remarkably oblivious of the obvious circumstance that ability to play an instrument does not automatically confer ability to teach. Ability to teach is the sought-after attribute here.
|
|
|
|
|