Hole undercutting
11:08 on Thursday, March 13, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Hole undercutting
17:13 on Thursday, March 13, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Hole undercutting
18:46 on Thursday, March 13, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Hole undercutting
11:13 on Saturday, March 15, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Hole undercutting
09:55 on Monday, March 17, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Hole undercutting
21:21 on Tuesday, March 18, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Hole undercutting
03:18 on Wednesday, March 19, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Hole undercutting
08:39 on Wednesday, March 19, 2008
|
|
|
Bilbo (1340 points)
|
I would say so. (Not in that end of the business) but the thing is that the drawn ones can be formed to do a similar thing.
I remember a discussion with Galway and Johan Brögger about his design ideas and he was advocationg a certain shape to the hole which produced a venturi (sort of) effect. I think that he was writing/speaking about his double conical tone holes shape. This concept may improve the efficiency of the tone. See the Brögger interviews at the bottom right of the page:
http://www.thegalwaynetwork.com/interviews/intervue2.htm
These interviews are very educational, lengthy and difficult to understand but in the second interview beginning at about 19:20, he discusses in depth these tone holes and the diameters.
My point is that there is a certain school of players that are more into the traditional older French flute model. This would be the soldered ones with little or no undercutting. They can project a fine tone without all of the modern additions that change to tone from the older sound to a more bright & edgy one.
|
|
|
|
Re: Hole undercutting
18:44 on Wednesday, March 19, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Hole undercutting
15:36 on Thursday, March 20, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Hole undercutting
18:16 on Thursday, March 20, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Hole undercutting
19:01 on Thursday, March 20, 2008
|
|
|
|