Re: pearlnundrum
Re: pearlnundrum
15:59 on Sunday, June 15, 2008
|
|
|
puzzled-dude (21 points)
|
First, many thanks for the valuable input I am recieving from each of you! There is certainly more to think of than meets the eye, and consideration is given to all suggestions.
Several items have become clear. First, that the headjoint is of paramount significance for overal tone and sound quality. In this regard, thanks to Suzie I obtained a ph7 headjoint for a very reasonable price. As possible, we will aquire as many different hj as possible when we can get low prices on them.
Second, that open/closed hole is mostly subjective, requiring experimentation to determine which a player may prefer, with plugged open holes leaving the most versatility. however if a player is not used to open hole, there appears little wrong with sticking to what you know.
Third, that there appears to be no argument of Pearl reliability and no suggestion of anything superior in this regard, so seems to confirm my original assessment.
So, allowing that, it seems the topic here refines to discussion/comparison/identification of the different Pearl bodies. (I will start a new string on headjoints so that this line can deal with the flute models themselves).
At what point would you decide a lower end model with all the bells and whistles be more desirable than a more simplistic body? (such as Quantz coda vs plain-jane Elegante or Cantible) Or is the answer simply that all the bells do not make up for a higher grade?
Also, if anyone has a chart showing the progression of Pearl models within thier respective classes, I'd appreciate a copy. If not, there may certainly be a market to write a buyers guide to Pearls (and others) of all ages so that buyers may easily see where a model is on the ladder. Anyone?
|
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
16:58 on Sunday, June 15, 2008
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
21:27 on Sunday, June 15, 2008
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
22:06 on Sunday, June 15, 2008
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
10:53 on Monday, June 16, 2008
|
|
|
JButky (657 points)
|
The only thing I have heard about Pearls is that one dealer refuses to sell them and some repair techs say they are a night mare to work on. |
|
This statement needs clarification because it is soo misleading and comes across as it stands as a cheap shot. Dealers refuse to sell all sorts of things for all sorts of reasons. That statement most likely has nothing to do with the product at all and such a comment should never be interpreted as such regardless of any brand. As far as some repair techs saying Pearls are a nightmare to work on...well they had better learn to fix flutes then...they can come and take my Napbirt University course on flute repair coming up in December.
Sorry, but that last comment touched a nerve. If you call yourself a repair tech, then you should be competent to fix any major brand of flute. That's what the public expects when they bring an instrument to fix. That particular retort is an insult to the CUSTOMER. If for some reason they "can't" work on a pearl, well, they are incompetent as a repair tech. "Can't" and "won't" do not mean the same thing. If I brought an instrument to a repair shop like that and that was the reply, I certainly would run out of there as fast as I could.
Whether anyone likes or dislikes them from a playing perspective compared to any other flute is an opinion and a choice. I have no problem with someone saying they like something else. That's a no-brainer. Everyone has a particular brand of flute or particular flute that they are particularly suited for. To make snide insinuations about product quality in this manner is just really bad form on the part of ANY dealer of ANYTHING.
Joe B
|
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
11:09 on Monday, June 16, 2008
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
14:09 on Monday, June 16, 2008
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
14:24 on Monday, June 16, 2008
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
15:09 on Saturday, June 21, 2008
|
|
|
puzzled-dude (21 points)
|
It certainly comes to light that as in many other fields, there are service technicians, and there are "service technicians". Many can disassemble, replace parts, and reassemble most mechanical objects. These folk I think of as "mechanics" (no offense intnded to any who fall in to that category, as in this regard it would describe myself concerning flutes and many other shiny things), rather than technicians, whom I would expect to be competent in diagnosing, troubleshooting, alignment, fine adjustment and tuning.
Further, as has been pointed out, should one promote themselves as a service tech, they need to remember the beginning of that description - service! The tech has a responsibility to perorm the work requested, or inform the client when repair or maintenance cost become unfeasible when compared to what may be available as a similar replacement unit on the current market.
The tech been engaged to bring the unit up to acceptable playing standards within it's model limitations, not comment on the "taste" of the client. Any such non-professional types should not be rewarded by paying them a "professional" wage.
As my profession is in the field of quality control and assurance, that takes care of my own little rant! *grin*
|
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
15:06 on Sunday, June 22, 2008
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
16:13 on Sunday, June 22, 2008
|
|
|
JButky (657 points)
|
Joe - what would you say are the significant differences between the 3 series you mentioned?, and how would a player notice these differences?
Are the key layouts or sizes differnt? Are the mechanism designs different? Is there a difference in reliability? |
|
The Mechanism is essentially the same. The quality of materials increases throughout the levels. The Key work gauge is much heavier on the middle and higher grades allowing the more heavily sculpted look. The highest keywork is all handmade and hand fit so reliability and feel are maximized.
Players notice the general smoothness of the action in a fine crafted mechanism, it's evenness, and overall feel. As more attention is given to actual fit, reliability improves. Those are the basic differences.
Joe B
|
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
16:27 on Sunday, June 22, 2008
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
20:27 on Sunday, June 22, 2008
|
|
|
puzzled-dude (21 points)
|
thanks Joe - that helps quite a bit. Thanks also to Suzie who sent me close-up photos of some models - I was able to clearly see the higher quality finish grades progress. I have always appreciated the craftmanship that goes in to finer fit and finish of metal objects.
I must have ben remiss in mentioning, Kara, that our local Pearl dealer has no Pearl flutes, and we that we have no local dealer for any of the other brands you have recommended. As much as we would love to try several as yourself and others have suggested, it appears that will require travel of approximately 1000 miles (guessing that Seattle or Salt Lake City will be the closest cities [unconfirmed]) to accomplish. On our annual holiday we do hit Salt Lake, Las Vegas, and sometimes L.A., which will come in September.
The 'fuss' you refer to would apprently be my desire to aquire the model that best satisfies my standards of quality and reliabilty, whilst being unable to physically inspect said object. I like to buck trends and act as an "informed" consumer.
Further, it is not in my nature or income level to throw about 2k without doing considerable research to ensure sufficient satisfaction for the money (not wealthy dude, remember). Trust me, she WILL be happy with what I select.
|
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
22:58 on Sunday, June 22, 2008
|
|
|
Re: pearlnundrum
23:12 on Sunday, June 22, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|