Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
18:04 on Saturday, October 25, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
05:42 on Sunday, October 26, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
16:35 on Sunday, October 26, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
17:20 on Sunday, October 26, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
17:47 on Sunday, October 26, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
18:37 on Sunday, October 26, 2008
|
|
|
Tibbiecow (480 points)
|
I think you might have another long (but not as long as the first) adjustment period before you get a consistently fantastic response from a new headjoint.
On the other hand, you might blow into a new headjoint only once and know THAT is the one.
I've had it both ways. I paid $1500 US for a Powell Philharmonic cut wood headjoint. I loved it at first blow, but wasn't able to keep it up to pitch for the first couple of weeks.
I also bought a Miyazawa MZ-5 off eBay for $350, thinking that if I didn't like it I could probably sell it for what money I had into it. I didn't really like it, and not any better than the HJ choiced I had, so I planned to sell it. I never listed it online, and nobody who tried it in person fell in love with it. I played it every now and then, and eventually came to like it. Now it is absolutely the silver HJ that I prefer, I don't want to sell it. I learned with it, and now I get a fabulous tone with volume in the really low end. I also managed to get the pitch in the high end under control with it.
When I was trying HJs, I found the Prima Sankyo NRS-1 to be very similar to the Yamaha EC cut. That's only my own opinion, but of the two I liked the Sankyo a bit better. Anyway, if I had already HAD the EC-cut HJ with my flute I would never have bothered to replace it with the Sankyo. (I replaced a weird, not-quite symmetrical handcut CY headjoint that came with my flute. I'm pretty sure that nobody else bought my particular Yamaha 881 flute because of this headjoint, and the fact that it was a C-foot. With a different HJ, most people LOVE my flute and can't believe that I bought it for $1800.)
|
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
15:41 on Monday, October 27, 2008
|
|
|
Plekto (423 points)
|
On the other hand, you might blow into a new headjoint only once and know THAT is the one.
****
So true. You have to try a bunch. For me, it was a love of wood flutes but an outright loathing of no-tech applications (other than Yamaha and a couple of others).
So a wood headjoint was a perfect "fit".
http://www.headjoints.com/
Of course, the nearest "dealer" to you in in the UK. I hear that the Powell wood headjoints are similar though.
I'm a fan of Powell, as well, that is, IF you can afford one.(used=good) But you can get any option that you desire, pretty much as well. I also like Yamaha though - tough and decently priced bodies(headjoints I give a solid 6-7 out of 10, though)
If you can, try a wood headjoint as well.
|
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
04:57 on Tuesday, October 28, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
05:06 on Tuesday, October 28, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
19:04 on Wednesday, October 29, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
05:05 on Thursday, October 30, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
18:18 on Friday, October 31, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
17:55 on Tuesday, November 11, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
04:21 on Wednesday, November 12, 2008
|
|
|
jose_luis (2369 points)
|
I think there is a certain pleasure in the quest for new equipment and I could be doing it for this reason.
Not a bad reason, provided one could spend that money unnecessarily and just for the pleasure....and the of hope of a faster improvement.
Sometimes a strong conviction could work miracles, even with my flute tone!
|
|
|
|
Re: Upgrading the HJ of a Yamaha 674
12:38 on Wednesday, November 12, 2008
|
|
|
Concert_Flute (25 points)
|
The subjectivity of headjoints never ceases to amaze me. I have had (past tense) a reasonable amount of experience with the Yamaha EC, and I still currently play a Sankyo with an NRS-1 headjoint occassionally.
I was really surprised that Tibbiecow found the NRS-1 to be "similar" to the Yamaha EC. T..cow did say that the NRS-1 was better, which I can somewhat agree there, (depending on the two specific heads being evaluated), but the designs of the two are fairly DIS-similar. I could always get a good clean sound on the EC, but the NRS-1 is more unique. For me, it has more versatility, and can articulate better. If I don't play it often enough, I tend to sound a little too airy on it, but re-calibrate myself in brief time. It is not my best HJ, but it is an easier blower in comparison. I find the NRS-1 more useful with certain music. For more serious tone and articulation-conscious playing, my newer Muramatsu is serving me nicely. I was ambivalent about it at first, but I eventually realized it was what I needed for personal improvement. I wanted to go after the "holy grail" flute, but financial constraints led to a more realistic acquisition. (At least for now, keeping the faith).
It is especially true that what a person is used to only seems better initially, but many times the diliked headjoint could be the one best for personal improvement. That's why, at times, it makes sense to take a good reputable cut that you find comfortable, and work to improve yourself with it, until it is the obvious bottleneck to further growth. The resources required to really find the eternally perfect headjoint may make more sense for the consummate professional within a specific genre of music.
Since I currently maintain two soprano flutes, an alto flute, a one-key barouque flute, an Irish flute (no keys), and a fife!, I try to stick with flutes where the embouchures, and/or the fingerings of notes, don't contradict each other in a way that messes with my psyche or affects my abilities too adversely. I've been rather fortunate in this area.
When I was learning tenor sax, I was always blaming the equipment, and after a few saxes, many mouthpieces, and even more reeds, I learned all there was to know about what my equipment could do for me and what different setups could produce, if worked properly. So now I could just play, without worrying about if I should just buy yet another mouthpiece, or whatever. So, if you need to experiment, just go for it, it's all part of the growth experience. Above all, ENJOY !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|