To the troll
04:39 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
07:03 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
12:14 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
14:13 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
14:16 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
15:19 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
16:18 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
19:22 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
19:56 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
20:28 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
03:06 on Wednesday, July 1, 2009
|
|
|
jose_luis (2369 points)
|
Sorry binx, it seems that I misunderstood you.
The voting system was installed about a year ago, when a previous outbreak of trollism and verbal violence was at its highest. It was well accepted then by our community as it is an exercise in forum democracy. But, as is also the case in some other aspects of majority polling, there can be abuses.
Thumbing down a post several times (with different accounts) makes it partially disappear from the thread, but it is still visible if you click on it, anyway.
It is not related at all with the closing of an account (I think you know this).
Owning of more than an unique account is unacceptable by the Forum rules, but this is difficult to detect and prevent, considering the wide availability of free public email addresses and the dynamic nature of the assignment of IP addresses by the ISPs. This is something we have to live with, as we have to live with the normal prevalence of poorly adapted (or plainly ill) people in our societies.
I do not find anything wrong in linking to a Youtube video, even if the original account is closed or the post was thumbed down. If the owner chose to leave the video there it is OK, IMO.
What I object to is an action to resurrect threads or posts from closed accounts. But it seems that it was not the case, so I apologize again.
|
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
05:49 on Wednesday, July 1, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
08:59 on Wednesday, July 1, 2009
|
|
|
jose_luis (2369 points)
|
Micron is right; however I still hold hopes that the forum will survive. We have been through worst situations in the recent past and we could survive.
It is true that some people, who had fought very hardly against the previous trolling outbreak (and won that battle), are now gone. This has been a hard blow to digest and an important success for the trollers.
This site has some on-demand moderation. It is weak and slow, but it is there. Each Forum has its own personality, given in part by their members and also by the admin/moderator.
I appreciate the large freedom we have here to be opinionated, to allow considerable subject drift within the same thread and the variety of people that come here and ask their question or provide answers.
It may happen that I do not feel so much comfortable in a strongly moderated forum. I am thinking of Galways' forum, that one, more than moderated is simply censored almost in real time.
As for the saxontheweb, I may give it a try. However, I do not like the name, to start with; I have no saxon origin that I know of and I might think I feel there sort of an intruder in such racially defined place. Or I may be a little paranoid about it; in any case I would appreciate if anybody could explain the why of such strange name. It does not seem related to saxophones, there is a surplus "n" there.
|
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
09:08 on Wednesday, July 1, 2009
|
|
|
Re: To the troll
09:11 on Wednesday, July 1, 2009
|
|
|
|