CessiMarie,
Thanks for the link to the paper. I believe this conversation is not so far from the original subject, although it has become rather technical.
I may have to wear hearing aids in my future, maybe near future, so I am interested also because of my case.
I have inspected the graphs in the paper. I note that even the worst performing (Lucite shell w/.15" vented) is good in damping high frequencies, which are those involved in the higher range our instruments and the piccolo. This model of earmold provides about 20 decibels damping at about 3 KHz frequencies. Reducing the vent hole to 0.03" increases the damping to 30 dB. Unvented models go well below 35 Db, but maybe they could be inconvenient to use permanently, I do not know. My mother had the highest gain model and it used a silicon earmold, vented type.
It is true that a lower frequencies the damping is little (0-3 dB), but this is not the range we are interested in.
Note that the Decibel is a logarithmic unit of measure. 20 Db amounts to a reduction in the sound power reaching your ear of 100 times. Though it may be more useful to speak in terms of sound pressure, I am not sure whether this is equivalent or it could represent only 10 times reduction, depending on the relationship between sound power and sound pressure. I had investigated this some time ago (for the older thread), but now I cannot recall.
Even at 10 times, the damping is important. Another thing to check is the correct range of frequencies of the piccolo. I think it plays an octave above our 3rd octave in the flute. If so, and if the low A in the C flute is 440 Hz, the low A in the piccolo should be 3,520 Hz, well in the range I estimated for reading the graph. But this is a fast calculation and it maybe wrong. Maybe someone else in the forum could check these values and correct if necessary.
So you may be reasonably protected, anyway!