flute metals and prices
12:47 on Sunday, March 11, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
20:55 on Sunday, March 11, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
22:27 on Sunday, March 11, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
22:57 on Sunday, March 11, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
11:36 on Monday, March 12, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
14:11 on Monday, March 12, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
09:20 on Tuesday, March 13, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
18:59 on Sunday, March 18, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
09:55 on Monday, March 19, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
11:54 on Monday, March 19, 2012
|
|
|
jduncmusic (22 points)
|
Well, I can tell you that if I swap headjoints back and forth on the exact same flute (same cut headjoint- only difference being the gold), they sound and feel quite different... and universally the gold makes the sound less harsh. I could easily detect which is which if blindfolded. While I don't know if the sound is "better" enough to warrant a price increase (I actually prefer the sound of just silver and wouldn't think to buy a headjoint with gold for myself), it does in fact affect the sound. I just had a Yamaha 461 which I did just this on about 3 weeks ago. The sound was definitely different with the gold. I don't change the price when selling a headjoint with gold vs. one without (these are refurbished flutes- not new), so the buyer didn't choose the gold because they thought the higher price meant a value increase, and nor did I make any additional money off the gold. They chose the gold because of sound. Also, as they are an older jazz musician, I can assure you that they didn't choose the gold because it was "pretty". The gold headjoint actually had more nicks and scratches than the just solid silver one I had.
<Added>
btw guys, "harsh" was the wrong word to use as it implies "not good". A better word selection on my part would be "bright". I would consider "bright" and "warm" to be on opposite ends of the spectrum. That said, compared to other flutes/headjoints, the Gemeinhardt J1s WITHOUT the gold that I mentioned in my previous post do tend to sound somewhat harsh in my opinion (so that is what I was immediately referring to when I used that particular term). I state again, "compared to other flutes". I DON'T think an even mid-range flute with a solid silver headjoint (no gold lining) sounds harsh by any means.... (just in case anyone took that I was insulting their flute!) However, of the ones I've tried back to back, they do sound less "warm" than the ones with the gold.
The individual who purchased the 461 wanted a warmer sound. For him, that was HIS "better" as I would assume is also the case for spencer (who posted above) who purchased a solid gold headjoint for their flute. For my playing, I prefer no gold. I prefer the projection I've found on the headjoints without gold- for me, the non-gold-lined headjoints are "better". So to state one last time, it's all a matter of preference. :)
|
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
11:56 on Monday, March 19, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
21:22 on Monday, March 19, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
21:26 on Monday, March 19, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
21:45 on Monday, March 19, 2012
|
|
|
Re: flute metals and prices
21:50 on Monday, March 19, 2012
|
|
|
|