Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222

    
Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222    22:53 on Thursday, August 18, 2005          
(Taylor F.)
Posted by Archived posts

It looks like i`m going to be choosing between these three bassoons pretty soon. Which of these three would you think would be the best for a semi-profesional college orchestra or i guess just in general


Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222    12:40 on Friday, August 19, 2005          
(a little birdie)
Posted by Archived posts

the Renard 222


Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222    13:09 on Friday, August 19, 2005          
(martin)
Posted by Archived posts

The Moosmann. I played a Schreiber S16 for a few years in the past. Reliable. I once played a Fox: A good instrument, but I don`t like it. Now I am playing a Moosmann: Really amazing for the money!


Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222    22:07 on Friday, August 19, 2005          
(Taylor U.)
Posted by Archived posts

I have a Schrieber and would recomend either the Schrieber or the Moosman, The more german the better in my opinion.


Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222    12:49 on Saturday, August 20, 2005          
(fred)
Posted by Archived posts

try and get the moosmann 150....i play a 200, my friend plays a 150, and they really are worth the extra money, because the question you have to ask yourself is, how long do you want to wait before you get a new instrument. in a semi professional setting, the moosmann 100 will last you 2 - 3 years, no more, you will have to upgrade, but the moosmann150 will last you a long time, my friend will see hiself playing it for a good 5 - 10 years to come


Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222    16:33 on Tuesday, August 23, 2005          
(Taylor F.)
Posted by Archived posts

actually i just put in an order for a bassoon and it will be coming in the mail this friday. Which bassoon you may be wondering. actually it was none of the above

It was......

Fox/Renard 220

I basically had the choice of the Fox 220 or the schreiber 5016. I used to take private lessons from a bassoon specialist/maintenence and repair technician and he told me the fox 220 would be better than the schreiber. Hopefully I made the right choice but i`m confident in it because of my old bassoon teacher. He played in the beijing symphony for years and has basically dedicated his life to bassoon so i`m assuming he knows quite a bit about this


Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222    09:52 on Thursday, August 25, 2005          
(fred)
Posted by Archived posts

yeah....thats a really good bassoon, steady as a rock...its also good cos you can ship it back to Alan Fox over in indiana for services...as opposed to a german bassoon....good luck with it


Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222    16:37 on Friday, August 26, 2005          
(Taylor F.)
Posted by Archived posts

Thanks for the help everyone

and i now present to you my brand new Fox/Renard 220

http://photobucket.com/albums/y262/djkaput/?action=view¤t=Bassoon003.jpg

http://photobucket.com/albums/y262/djkaput/?action=view¤t=Bassoon004.jpg

Im gonna have to get used to the keys because they are quite different than my old schreiber. a lot of the keys are square shapped where my old bassoons were all rounded.


Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222    11:57 on Thursday, September 15, 2005          
(Jamie)
Posted by Archived posts

You need to polish those finger prints off that beautiful bassoon!! :-)

*gets old beat up Renard 41 out and looks at your bassoon...jealous*


   




This forum: Older: crowing
 Newer: My bassoon is bleeding