Fox or Schreiber?
17:09 on Tuesday, March 3, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Fox or Schreiber?
17:54 on Tuesday, March 3, 2009
|
|
|
flute_n_bassoon (309 points)
|
Posted by flute_n_bassoon
I couldn't tell you. All I've played on are a plastic selmer in 7th grade and the schreiber I've been playing ever since...let me know if you find the answer to your question, i'd like to know too
|
|
|
|
Re: Fox or Schreiber?
00:26 on Wednesday, March 4, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Fox or Schreiber?
14:24 on Wednesday, March 4, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Fox or Schreiber?
22:59 on Wednesday, March 4, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Fox or Schreiber?
23:56 on Friday, March 13, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Fox or Schreiber?
05:23 on Saturday, March 14, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Fox or Schreiber?
11:37 on Saturday, March 14, 2009
|
|
|
flute_n_bassoon (309 points)
|
Posted by flute_n_bassoon
ahhh...that would explain why everyone says schriebers are bad. I play on a 60 yr old shreiber, and its FAB! I was always confused about why everyone I ntalk to syas Schrieber suck, and fox is better, although I dont like fox. The low register is harder to get out, and it doesnt play as easy as my schrieber. However, the new foxes are probably better than the new schriebers...
|
|
|
|
Re: Fox or Schreiber?
01:46 on Sunday, March 15, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Fox or Schreiber?
10:48 on Sunday, March 15, 2009
|
|
|
flute_n_bassoon (309 points)
|
Posted by flute_n_bassoon
By the way,you may want to look into used bassoons,because then you could afford a better instrument than you are looking at with your price range now. Also, as you have heard in this forum, older bassoons are usually better quality? (not a proven fact) I have also heard that older bassoons are better because the wood ages longer or something, but that may be a complete myth...
|
|
|
|
|