Pachelbel Kanon

    
Pachelbel Kanon    15:27 on Friday, August 29, 2003          
(Harvey)
Posted by Archived posts

I`ve heard many orchestras play it at 440 Hz, but isn`t it supposed to be played at 415 Hz? If you play it, what frequency (for A4) do you use?


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    07:49 on Tuesday, September 2, 2003          
(ben)
Posted by Archived posts

its canon, n wot r u tlkin bout?


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    19:02 on Tuesday, September 2, 2003          
(Harvey)
Posted by Archived posts

Sorry...yeah, it`s Canon in English.

What am I talking about? If you really want to know then read this:
http://www-math.cudenver.edu/~jstarret/tuninghist.html


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    16:44 on Monday, September 15, 2003          
(Andrew)
Posted by Archived posts

Although it is supposed to be played at 415hz, many orchestras (or quartets...etc) play it to the 440 becuase:

A) Its easier to tune to a metronome, since most metronomes give off a 440hz "A"
B) You can adjust your intonation easier to 440, since thats what most people (I`m making an assumption) use as an "A"
C) If you`re playing pieces after the Kanon, then theres no point re-tuning the whole orchstra.


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    18:20 on Monday, September 15, 2003          
(Ashley)
Posted by Archived posts

u people r confusing me ne way I and in the 7th grade and I played the pachabell cannon with my ensemble at a wedding last year in houston texas


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    18:55 on Monday, September 15, 2003          
(Andrew)
Posted by Archived posts

Not that much younger than me. I played it in grade 6, and im in grade 9 now...


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    19:34 on Monday, September 15, 2003          
(zina ballbina)
Posted by Archived posts

yo what`s the big deal? just play!


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    18:47 on Wednesday, September 17, 2003          
(Harvey)
Posted by Archived posts

The big deal is maintaining authenticity.


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    20:04 on Thursday, September 18, 2003          
(Rachel)
Posted by Archived posts

The authenticity thing... I read a whole lot of books on music philosophy last year, and one idea that really struck me was that we could never hear a performance as the people of the time heard it, because to their ears it would have sounded quite new, but to our ears it sounds "old" and sometimes rather unadventurous.
Similar to this line of thought is my thought that although the Canon may have been written at 415Hz, I have heard it played at that pitch and it sounds like Db instead of D. The people of the time would have perceived music played at that pitch much the same as we perceive music played at 440Hz- our concept (for those of us who are key-sensitive) of D major has changed in the past few hundred years.


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    23:16 on Friday, October 10, 2003          
(Rachel)
Posted by Archived posts

what are the notes? i can only play by ear on the piano viola notes not violin


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    14:51 on Saturday, October 11, 2003          
(Harvey)
Posted by Archived posts

The viola part is the same as the first violin part, just 4 measures later.


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    00:56 on Sunday, October 12, 2003          
(Jen)
Posted by Archived posts

hey. Pachelbel, as you spell it is actually spelt Pachabel. Just to let you know
Jen.


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    08:11 on Tuesday, October 14, 2003          
(DW)
Posted by Archived posts

It`s not uncommon. Even pianists do that to their piano. Esp if the piano is to be used for exams or full length concert recitals...They just tune slightly higher.


Re: Pachelbel Kanon    18:22 on Tuesday, October 14, 2003          
(Harvey)
Posted by Archived posts

WHAT???


   




This forum: Older: is it possible to...
 Newer: Nice article about violin strings