talent versus training
18:20 on Saturday, November 15, 2003
|
|
|
(NAMUS)
|
how many years do you think it takes to master your instrument...and perhaps what does it mean:that you read a score the fastest,that you are ready to perform your piece the fastest with minimal training or that you have played the Rach3 sucessfully???
|
|
|
|
Re: talent versus training
02:45 on Sunday, November 16, 2003
|
|
|
(Rachel)
|
I think that true mastery of an instrument is achieved when you can play any combination of notes, in any rhythm, at any tempo, at any volume, with any advanced technique (eg for clarinet- gliss, multiphonic, flutter tonguing) and do it well.
I have been playing the clarinet for 10 years and I am still working on that.
|
|
|
|
Re: talent versus training
10:08 on Sunday, November 16, 2003
|
|
|
(NAMUS)
|
good, thanks for your reply rachel
|
|
|
|
Re: talent versus training
10:19 on Monday, November 17, 2003
|
|
|
Re: talent versus training
13:35 on Monday, November 17, 2003
|
|
|
(Russell)
|
I think some people are gifted, like a tenor player I know, but that all people really wanting to master an instrument can master it. You don`t have to be born with anything but a genuin interest and stubborness when it feels like it os going backwards.
|
|
|
|
|