Orpheus
19:10 on Monday, October 2, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
19:29 on Monday, October 2, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
19:49 on Monday, October 2, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
23:31 on Monday, October 2, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
21:46 on Tuesday, October 10, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
21:47 on Tuesday, October 10, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
22:04 on Tuesday, October 10, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
22:10 on Tuesday, October 10, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
00:28 on Wednesday, October 11, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
18:51 on Wednesday, October 11, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
19:27 on Wednesday, October 11, 2006
|
|
|
Flutist06 (1545 points)
|
To me, the option between materials does not matter. There are all different levels of wooden flutes available, from junker Chinese imports, to decently built imports, to purely professional instruments. If wood is what Afroburst likes, that's fine, but if not, metal is fine too. I'm not debating the idea of a wood flute vs. a metal one. I'm debating the importance of a closed hole flute to a French one, regardless of material. I do indeed play an openhole instrument, but I am one of the few who chooses to use the open holes for experimentation with extended effects beyond the initial fascination, not to mention that the flute I play is a custom instrument, and existed before I purchased it. I did not want to take the risk of a different flute playing differently, as this one fit me so well. That last sentence of yours just honestly is not correct, as I'm sure Micron and any number of other members can vouch for. The French configuration offers no more projection than a plateau keyed flute. If it did, the notes associated with venting through the keys (Bb, A, F#, F, E) with perforations would sound much louder than the other notes throughout the range, but you never hear anyone comment on that phenomena, do you? Also, why would top notch flute makers like Brannen and Muramatsu offer plateau models in their custom built instruments if they were in any way inferior to open hole models?
|
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
19:48 on Wednesday, October 11, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
19:57 on Wednesday, October 11, 2006
|
|
|
Flutist06 (1545 points)
|
It's a very common misconception, and one that is still circulating, that more advanced students should play open holed instruments. Gradually, people are starting to move away from the open hole, inline G = better flute than offset, plateau thing (in fact, roughly 70% of what most makers build nowadays are offset). Last year, at the NFA convention, Brannen unveiled the Albert Cooper Orchestral model flute, with a plateau mechanism in the left hand, and French key configuration in the right, which was directed exclusively at professional flutists. As I said in a previous thread, the only reason open hole flutes are as popular as they are is the same reason that inline G flutes became associated with higher level instruments. The Paris Conservatory adopted the open hole system so that its students could learn the more contemporary repertoire that was gaining popularity early in the last century. Since the school was among the most highly respected music schools in the world, other groups began to use them as the standard without ever thinking about the benefits and disadvantages of both systems. As people rethink these things, flutes are changing.
|
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
21:00 on Wednesday, October 11, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Orpheus
22:36 on Wednesday, October 11, 2006
|
|
|
|