Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
16:55 on Sunday, January 20, 2008
|
|
|
poeme (19 points)
|
Hi,
Anyone got any experience with one or both of these flutes? I have them on apro, but not really happy with either. I'm looking for a professional level, but on a very tight budget.
Also have other poeple experienced noisey pads before? I haven't until the Miyazawa - is this something that happens with straubinger pads? They make a wierd sticky noise as they release from the tone holes.
One other thing, bearing in mind I told the shop I was looking for professional level, he produced a yamaha 671 with a cheapish nagahara hj. would you class this as professional? If so, why did they agree to sell my yamaha 617????
Thanks in advance,
Poeme
<Added>
Sorry, did not mean to sond bad about the Nagahara hj, I did only say 'cheaper' as it was only £1000. The one I really want to get when I have more money and a decent flute to put it on is double that, which is why I sad cheaper, and didn't explain myself - sorry!
|
|
|
|
Re: Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
17:04 on Sunday, January 20, 2008
|
|
|
Account Closed (3248 points)
|
A cheapish nagahara hj??? Nagahara does not make cheap headjoints and are highly sought after by many top notch flutists. They make wonderful headjoints!!
And yes, Straubinger pads do make more noise. When I go to have my flute re padded I will not go with them again.
Both are fine flutes and can be played professionally, so don't really look at the price. I have been playing on a Muramatsu EX for the past month even though it cost me about 10% price of my handmade flute. I prefer the cheaper one. More expensive is not always better. Just something to keep in mind
I would still pick the Muramatsu or Miyazawa over the Yamaha.
I like both Muramatsu and Miyazawa, so it would be hard for me to pick. If you are not thrilled with either one, I suggest waiting and shopping around more if you can.
|
|
|
|
Re: Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
17:05 on Sunday, January 20, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
17:36 on Sunday, January 20, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
07:24 on Monday, January 21, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
15:28 on Monday, January 21, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
15:39 on Monday, January 21, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
16:30 on Monday, January 21, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
18:14 on Monday, January 21, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
20:40 on Monday, January 21, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
20:52 on Monday, January 21, 2008
|
|
|
Re: Muramatsu GX versus Miyazawa Type I (no Brogger system)
03:15 on Tuesday, January 22, 2008
|
|
|
|