Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
11:33 on Sunday, May 18, 2008
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
17:59 on Sunday, May 18, 2008
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
19:24 on Sunday, May 18, 2008
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
21:21 on Sunday, May 18, 2008
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
21:21 on Sunday, May 18, 2008
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
23:18 on Sunday, May 18, 2008
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
00:03 on Monday, May 19, 2008
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
00:23 on Monday, May 19, 2008
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
00:39 on Monday, May 19, 2008
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
01:07 on Monday, May 19, 2008
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
18:03 on Monday, February 16, 2009
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
22:46 on Monday, February 16, 2009
|
|
|
Tibbiecow (480 points)
|
Several years ago, I understand that the Roy Seaman piccolos and the Zentner piccolos were essentially the same piccolo, manufactured at the same place, under two different names.
These piccs have a great reputation. I have a Zentner piccolo. It is really, really nice. (At least in its ~$1500 used price range)
Gemeinhardt bought the specs for these piccolos. Zentner did NOT sell his name toward the manufacture of the newer ones.
I have played a new Gemeinhardt-made Seaman piccolo. It was nowhere near the piccolo that my Zentner is- tone, scale, feel... I really did not like the Seaman and actually preferred the Sonare plastic piccolo, or the Yamaha 62 wood piccolo, to the Gem/Seaman.
As for the Gem flutes, I did have a 3SHB made in the late 1980's. Its headjoint was unmarked. It was miles more responsive than the Armstrong 104-N that I played before, but 1)its scale sucked and 2) to get that pretty response, I learned the VERY bad habit of blowing across the embouchure hole, not at all down into it as I should have been. Once I was taught how to properly aim and focus my airstream by a competent teacher- on a Yamaha CY silver headjoint, BTW, I could NOT STAND the Gemeinhardt HJ.
So, my suspicion is that those who get along just dandy with most of the Gemeinhardt headjoints is that they are probably not blowing properly.
When I first began looking into different flutes, for a possible upgrade, one of the things that got my attention regarding the 'pro' Gemeinhardts was that there really is no such thing. How many people get a Brannen, Miyazawa, or Powell flute and replace the stock headjoint with a Gemeinhardt HJ??
|
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
21:19 on Tuesday, February 17, 2009
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
21:38 on Tuesday, February 17, 2009
|
|
|
Re: `Woodwind` Flutes & Piccolos vs. `Gemeinhardt` Flutes & Piccolos...
22:50 on Tuesday, February 17, 2009
|
|
|
|