Tibbiecow asked for more explanations about "the why" of this poll. I am not looking for terms to solve the no-gender or perceived gender of the piccolo. "Baby". "relative", "cousin" and others are OK, but this not what I am looking for.
The idea came to my mind while consulting this problem in a another Forum; I was looking for a way to prove (or disprove) that there maybe unconscious residual gender for some nouns. The family metaphor question was perfect for it and I posted this idea there. There was an interesting reply, which I quote below.
Note that Bernstein and Britten had opposite views (brother and sister):
" Re: Nouns gender
Now this is very interesting, what you have brought up, I'm sorry it took me so long to understand. I took a look on google and found lots of articles talking about the piccolo as the little brother of the flute family, the bass clarinet the big brother of the clarinet, and the English horn as the big brother of the oboe. But Leonard Bernstein (for a kids' concert) also talked about the piccolo as being the little sister of the woodwinds.
Quote:
What do we mean when we say "families"? Well, I'm sure most of you must have heard that word "family" used over and over again whenever the orchestra was being described to you. You're always hearing about the woodwind family, with Mama clarinet, and Grandfather bassoon:
[BASSOON: Prokofieff - Peter and the Wolf]
You all know that one. And little sister piccolo, and big sister flute, and uncle English horn, and auntie oboe. And all the rest of the family. Well, in spite of all that baby-talk, it's still true that these woodwinds are a sort of family. They're alike because they're all played by blowing wind into them, and they're all - well, almost all - made of wood. So they're called woodwinds. They all sit near one another, and behave like a family. And they have all kinds of cousins, too, different kinds of clarinets, for instance: like the little E-flat clarinet, and the bass clarinet. And then there are saxophones, and alto flutes, oboe d'amore, and contra-bassoons. Oh, it's a long list. Thank you. And there's even a group of sort of second cousins, called the French horns. And they're second cousins because they're made of brass, and they really should belong to the brass family; but they blend so well with either the woodwinds or the brass that they are related to both families - so that they're kind of in-laws, I guess.
To compare, Britten's "A Young Person's Guide To The Orchestra" only has one mention of brother or sister in the whole text, even though it's all about musical families:
Quote:
Now let us hear each instrument play a variation of its own. The highest of the Woodwind theme is the clear, sweet voice of the FLUTE, with its shrill little brother, the PICCOLO.
I had trouble finding anything of note for the strings or the brass.
So I'm forced to say that there isn't any real consistency in this. Note in the Britten that in the same sentence where the piccolo is a little brother, the flute is an "it".
I don't know if this is conclusive, but I think it indicates that there isn't really any historical basis for the unconscious noun gendering in these examples.
What do you think?
"
Those interested can follow that conversation here:
http://forum.wordreference.com/showthread.php?p=5299174#post5299174.
Also, the issue of how we should call ourselves was introduced recently in that same thread so it could add some additional interest. But I understand it has been settled here long ago and we are to be called "Flutists".
<Added>Please continue answering the sister/ brother/ none (or other) question.