Open hole, closed hole, and tone
Open hole, closed hole, and tone
15:39 on Monday, March 23, 2009
|
|
|
Tibbiecow (480 points)
|
Does anyone care to help debunk the 'open hole flutes have a more open tone' theory?
My idea:
Take a good open hole flute, that has keys that can be plugged and unplugged easily. (perhaps by plastic student plugs, or Powell Plug-Os)
Have two flute players to play the flute. The first would be the one with the best flute tone. He/she would be blindfolded, and play the flute without hands on the keys. Perhaps holding the barrel would help.
The second flute player would move the keys, to finger notes on a particular scale and then a brief musical passage. Then, player 2 would either remove or put in plugs, with player 1 not knowing which, and the scale and brief musical passage repeated.
Obviously, the two players would have to rehearse this until they were both comfortable 'playing' the flute at once.
This way, you could set up a double blind test, where neither the 'player' (blower!) and the listner (via sound files) knows whether the holes are plugged or not. And then we could all listen for this 'open hole flutes have a more open tone', and hopefully a)put it to rest and b)leave it as a reference to those who want to argue about open holes and tone.
I would suggest also that the flute be tested at the shop of a good technician, or be fresh from the shop, to remove the possible effect of padding leaks on the flute's tone.
|
|
|
|
Re: Open hole, closed hole, and tone
16:37 on Monday, March 23, 2009
|
|
|
arabians207 (259 points)
|
I've actually tried playing my flute with someone else fingering just a scale..and its actually really hard to play like that! Maybe with a lot of practice with both people you could get the flute to sound like it would with just one person playing..
if you've never tried playing like that, you should lol. Its a lot harder than it sounds! Plus I kept laughing which didn't make it go any better :P We did this for a clinic (cannot remember exactly what the point was.. there was a point, though! I think embouchure work?)
But its really hard.. its a good idea to test the open holes vs. not, but i think that the sound a player would get with someone else doing the fingers would not be the same as what they are capable from getting by themselves.. mostly just because you wouldn't know as when/how to change your embouchure based on the range etc.. if you knew exactly what the other person was going to do it might also make it easier on the blower.. so maybe just a bunch of practice would be necessary in order to make it work?
I hope that makes sense..
|
|
|
|
Re: Open hole, closed hole, and tone
18:35 on Monday, March 23, 2009
|
|
|
Tibbiecow (480 points)
|
quote" so maybe just a bunch of practice would be necessary in order to make it work?"
Absolutely.
But it would be necessary that the 'player' creating the tone doesn't know whether he is playing open or closed tone holes. I can't figure any way that someone would not feel the open vs. plugged, and thus know what he's playing, which makes the 'test' not particularly scientifically valid.
I did this in high school, just messing around, when my best friend broke her arm. And it IS difficult. If someone has a regular duet partner, that might make it easier since the two already know the others' nuances during playing. And I'm hoping that a nice scale or two (covering two octaves, especially showing the difference between covered-open-hole-notes such as low C through Eb, and open-open-hole notes such as C, left-hand B and Bb, and A) would just about be enough to 'show' how this works.
Perhaps also we would want to demonstrate tone changes with an Eb2 played first without, then with (wrong fingering) LH1, and also the F# on the staff played with RH2, then RH3, so that we can hear icky vs clear tone on the recordings.
|
|
|
|
Re: Open hole, closed hole, and tone
23:09 on Monday, March 23, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Open hole, closed hole, and tone
23:44 on Monday, March 23, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Open hole, closed hole, and tone
00:01 on Tuesday, March 24, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Open hole, closed hole, and tone
12:28 on Tuesday, March 24, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Open hole, closed hole, and tone
15:25 on Tuesday, March 24, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Open hole, closed hole, and tone
16:09 on Tuesday, March 24, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Open hole, closed hole, and tone
23:29 on Tuesday, March 24, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Open hole, closed hole, and tone
14:30 on Thursday, March 26, 2009
|
|
|
Re: Open hole, closed hole, and tone
21:28 on Thursday, March 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|