what`s the prolem with gemeinhardt flutes?
21:08 on Thursday, June 30, 2011
|
|
|
Re: what`s the prolem with gemeinhardt flutes?
01:15 on Friday, July 1, 2011
|
|
|
Re: what`s the prolem with gemeinhardt flutes?
12:49 on Friday, July 1, 2011
|
|
|
Re: what`s the prolem with gemeinhardt flutes?
18:39 on Monday, July 4, 2011
|
|
|
Re: what`s the prolem with gemeinhardt flutes?
12:59 on Wednesday, July 6, 2011
|
|
|
Re: what`s the prolem with gemeinhardt flutes?
18:14 on Wednesday, July 13, 2011
|
|
|
Tibbiecow (480 points)
|
First, professional/symphony-level flutist, flute teacher's opinion on the Gemeinhardt flutes:
http://jennifercluff.blogspot.com/2007/01/why-some-flute-brands-and-not-others.html
If you explore Jen Cluff's webpages, you can learn quite a lot.
A Gemmie student flute should be just fine for the first year or two of band, but their 'step up' and 'pro' flutes are simply student models with added features such as open holes, B-footjoint, silver, and pointed keys. They look like better flutes, but the upgrades are a bit like putting custom wheels and leather seat covers on a Yugo- it still drives like a Yugo.
The most compelling 'evidence' I have seen for the Gemmies not really being appropriate step-up instruments, is that highly talented/advanced players pretty much never replace the headjoint of their Powell, Altus, Sankyo, Brannen or Muramatsu flute with a Gemeinhardt 'pro, handcut' headjoint.
As far as Gemeinhardt making good piccolos, but poor flutes, I don't know why they do...but they do. Our regional symphony's principal has an older Gemeinhardt wood piccolo. I've played it, and it is really nice. It's not as nice as the Burkart piccolo that another symphony member has, but it is nice. When the Gemmie picc needed to be rebuilt, its player ordered in some newer, fancier instruments to see if she wanted to replace the Gemmie, but in the end was perfectly happy having the Gemmie overhauled.
|
|
|
|
Re: what`s the prolem with gemeinhardt flutes?
06:29 on Saturday, July 16, 2011
|
|
|
|