Re: piccolo
20:07 on Tuesday, November 2, 2004
|
|
|
(oboechick)
|
when it comes to your instrument you have to like it...cuz i wouldnt be happy playing an Armstrong, and Laura wouldnt be happy playing a Gemienhardt..but there are some ppl that dont care...
Hope you fine your wooden piccolo..they sound BEAUTIFUL!
|
|
|
|
The Same
20:23 on Tuesday, November 2, 2004
|
|
|
(Meme)
|
It is quite illogical.
So if you have an Armstrong wooden piccolo that sounded like S### then you would be quite happy?
It is the piccolo that matters, not the brand.
|
|
|
|
The Same
01:59 on Wednesday, November 3, 2004
|
|
|
(Meme)
|
Like, if you were offered names such as Eldred Spell, Burkart-Phelan, Hammig, or the very expensive top Yamaha, YPC-91, would you turn them down?
|
|
|
|
The Same
02:00 on Wednesday, November 3, 2004
|
|
|
(Meme)
|
....not to mention Powell, Muramatsu, etc. :-)
|
|
|
|
eesh
07:58 on Wednesday, November 3, 2004
|
|
|
(Laura)
|
oh my gosh people, lol. Get a grip. If I`m going to order a used piccolo off the internet I want it to be a brand I am confidant with...that would be Armstrong. I don`t trust names like Gemeinhardt or Yamaha at all. If I went to a store and had a chance to test all of the flutes of course I would test other brands. But when all I can do is look at the brand name I`m going to go with Armstrong. Eesh.
|
|
|
|
The Same
20:23 on Wednesday, November 3, 2004
|
|
|
(Meme)
|
Get a grip yourself!
IF there is a single model of piccolo that has general agreement among flute players that it is great value for money, a great player, and very reliable, it is NOT Armstrong, but Yamaha model YPC62.
This has been amply demonstrated in other flute forums. I don`t recall ANYBODY writing negatively of it. Sure, you can pay twice the price and open the door to a range of slightly superior options, but your outright condemning of Yamaha piccolos puts you on a limb, and demonstrates quite a degree of ignorance, sorry to say. But I`ve said it because your post is misguiding to other buyers in that it mis-represents both Yamaha and the widely held opinions of experienced flute/piccolo players. Have a happy day. :-)
|
|
|
|
none
22:08 on Wednesday, November 3, 2004
|
|
|
(Laura)
|
I don`t CARE what other people say. As I`ve said, I`m getting a brand I trust! For pete`s sake, just let me decide what kind of piccolo I want to buy by myself. If you go back to my original post I`ve known what I want the WHOLE time, and I never asked for advice on it. Just help finding this specific piccolo.
|
|
|
|
The Same
19:40 on Thursday, November 4, 2004
|
|
|
(Meme)
|
If you saw the examples of really scruffy manufacture Armstrong flutes and clarinets that I have seen, then you would not have so much confidence in the brand.
Is the info you want here?
http://www.cgconn.com/catalog/results.php
|
|
|
|
Re: piccolo
19:41 on Thursday, November 4, 2004
|
|
|
none
20:38 on Thursday, November 4, 2004
|
|
|
Armstrong piccs
21:28 on Thursday, November 4, 2004
|
|
|
(ninafire)
|
Granted my Armstrong picc is an older one, but it really is a wonderfully responsive instrument. I also own a vintage wood Haynes Db picc (makes Stars & Stripes a breeze, btw). I tested a number of different piccs when I bought the Armstrong, and it was my favorite. It plays easily in tune with itself all the way up to the high C and has a pretty, sweet tone. I once loaned it to a friend who`s Weissman was in the shop for it`s annual COA and she actually said she liked my humble little Armstrong better. Of course, if I actually played picc more frequently, I would LOVE to get my hands on a cocuswood Burkart-Phelan, but for as often as I really play it, my little Armstrong was well worth the money. So there are good ones out there, you just have to play a bunch to find them.
|
|
|
|
|