clarinet- oboe?
21:37 on Wednesday, December 14, 2005
|
|
|
(Sarah)
|
is there any relation between the clarinet and the oboe?
|
|
|
|
Re: clarinet- oboe?
08:23 on Friday, December 16, 2005
|
|
|
(Chris)
|
Nope not really. Similar fingerings, I think. I`ve never played the clarinet. I believe the bore dimensions are totally different. Also, the obvious difference that the oboe is double reed and the clarinet is single reed.
|
|
|
|
Re: clarinet- oboe?
10:43 on Friday, December 16, 2005
|
|
|
(Kosh)
|
Well the general idea behind all the woodwinds is the same, so yes there is a relation. Many of the fingerings are similer.
|
|
|
|
Re: clarinet- oboe?
00:35 on Saturday, December 17, 2005
|
|
|
(Scotch)
|
The oboe is the clarinet`s maternal third cousin, twice removed.
|
|
|
|
Re: clarinet- oboe?
08:31 on Saturday, December 17, 2005
|
|
|
(Serge)
|
Sarah,
The most important difference between the oboe and the clarinet is that the oboe has a conical bore (like the saxophone) whereas the clarinet has a cylindrical bore (like the flute). The bore is the space inside the instrument that the air moves through. A cylindrical bore stays the same width from the mouthpiece to the bell. A conical bore gets gradually wider as it moves from the mouthpice to the bell.
Consequences are:
- timbre: the clarinet is softer, the oboe richer
- fingering: the same fingering allows the oboe to jump an octave: from C to c, e.g., on the clarinet you`ll get a dodecime (C - g)
Of course, the single - double reed question is also important, but less so in my eyes. Buffet-Crampon in France experimented with single-reed oboes, and it still sounded like a (kind of) oboe, they say.
Is there any relationship between Sarah and the oboe?
Cheers
Serge
|
|
|
|
|