Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
06:30 on Monday, November 6, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
10:28 on Monday, November 6, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
17:39 on Monday, November 6, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
18:04 on Wednesday, November 8, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
18:16 on Wednesday, November 8, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
18:28 on Wednesday, November 8, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
18:43 on Wednesday, November 8, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
00:31 on Thursday, November 9, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
21:39 on Thursday, November 9, 2006
|
|
|
bobsacamano (158 points)
|
I will agree that sax and trumpet players play way more interesting solos than most trombone players. The trombonist has a difficult time due to the nature of the instrument. He spends so much time learning how to play technically well that the interesting harmonies of jazz progressions gets left out the window.
That being said, Curtis Fuller's solo on "Blue Train" is one of the most incredible trombone solos of all time, and JJ Johnson's solo on "Laura" is another classic. There is some good stuff to be learned from transcribing those two solos.
There are only a handful of jazz trombone players that I enjoy listening to now. Among them are Steve Davis, David Gibson, Conrad Herwig, and Wycliffe Gordon.
My complaint about Curtis Fuller is while he played some very good solos, there are also some crappy ones in there too. Listen to his solo on "Mode for Joe" on the album of the same name. Curtis basically has two ideas which he spans over two minutes, basically runs out of ideas. Meanwhile, Joe Henderson simply blows his away on the same tune.
I spend most of my time listening to the jazz solos of basically every other instrument besides the trombone, and marvelling at the genius of some of their lines and rhythmic ideas, wondering if the trombone can ever do such a thing.
As for the amount of my practice time as a trombone player? Most of it is spent practicing classical stuff, so that may have something to do with my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
17:08 on Wednesday, July 4, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
17:10 on Wednesday, July 4, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
20:27 on Wednesday, July 4, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
21:49 on Saturday, July 7, 2007
|
|
|
conductorjonz (4 points)
|
While I wouldn't question the greatness of any particular player over another, let alone their solos, I think the definition of musicallity comes into play here.
I personally have never been a huge fan of many of the trombonists listed in previous remarks. I do acknowledge a great contribution of each though. I think the trend toward a less "musical" and more "technicallly" based solo is not where the strength of our instrument is. Musicallity is, in my opinion, playing with the melody and embellishing around it. It is in swinging hard and making a statement in your playing without showing everything you know in one solo. You shouldn't have to play 32 choruses to show what you know. Carl Fontana was so good, it is said he never seemed to even feel compelled to state his name when playing in show bands around Vegas. He just played to the best of his ability.
I watched Al Grey cut the hell out of younger player's in one well structured chorus...including me on one occassion. He was 72 yrs old...I was 25. (Harumph...) Even Bob Havens from the Lawrence Welk Orch. played a most creative Teagarden influenced trombone.
J.J. and others cleared the way for all jazz trombonists outside of a large emsemble, but sometimes in a search ahead we must look back to Jack Teagarden who largely orginated false slide positions, Lawrence Brown who introduced speed on the slide, Tyree Glenn, who played perfectly in-tune even with a plunger and mute, Trummy Young who could blow bricks out of a wall, Dick Nash who can do it all, Tommy Dorsey who plays the prettiest ballad and virtually created the singing trombone in jazz.
The list is endless, and to hang all of our hopes on J.J. and Curtis Fuller...Bill Watrous or Steve Turre...or Miff Mole and Vic Dickenson is foolhearty at best. I would suggest seeking out solos from all of the above and many more to find how this instrument has evolved and perhaps some inspiration can be found. It is a sure bet you'll find that Colman Hawkins and Roy Eldridge had some solos that were eclipsed by their trombone playing counterparts.
Technique and speed is nice, but tone and a nice clean solo is where its really at. Remember...Artie Shaw said it best "You can't educate the public from the bandstand".
I love 'em all...some more than others...but I can find "greatness" in all of these trombonists. I surely have some work to do to "catch them". By the way...I play trumpet too...occassionally. I'm not too interested in that instrument anymore as I just want to play a nice ballad and have a pretty tone. To hell with all that other technical business...but I still have admiration for the likes of Bob McChesney...and ever Rosolino.
|
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
16:02 on Monday, July 30, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Why is there so many lousy trombone solos out there?
22:40 on Monday, July 30, 2007
|
|
|
|