no squeeks

    
no squeeks    09:59 on Friday, September 19, 2003          
(ben)
Posted by Archived posts

i really need help.
I know dominant strings are better then normal strings, but the normal ones shouldn`t always squeek should they?


Re: no squeeks    11:44 on Friday, September 19, 2003          
(Martin Milner)
Posted by Archived posts

Give us a little more context Ben.

You may be using too much/too little rosin, not enough bow pressure - bow may be too tight, etc.

Dominants are a good all round string, but another brand may work better on your particular instrument. If you know, tell us what it is, so people can suggest what strings they find work well.

I tend to squeek only if I`m playing on the E-string and hit the body of the violin with the bowhair. The hair doesn`t make proper contact with the string, hence squeeks.


Re: no squeeks    11:58 on Friday, September 19, 2003          
(me)
Posted by Archived posts

u might be playing to close to the bridge and not in the middle between the fingerboard and the bridge


Re: no squeeks    12:02 on Friday, September 19, 2003          
(Elizabeth Ward)
Posted by Archived posts

I`m an advanced player (between grade 8 and diploma level) and there are some factory strings that i find it very hard not to squeak on. Change the strings.

liz


Re: no squeeks    12:28 on Friday, September 19, 2003          
(Caroline)
Posted by Archived posts

I use Aricore strings, which are very good, I rarely squeak, for the price, you might as well buy some new strings.


Re: no squeeks    19:26 on Friday, September 19, 2003          
(Harvey)
Posted by Archived posts

I heard that Eudoxa are good strings to develop good bowing on.


Re: no squeeks    03:36 on Saturday, September 20, 2003          
(Elizabeth Ward)
Posted by Archived posts

Eudoxas are lovely. But Ben is a beginner on a cheap Chinese instrument: not a combination for eudoxas!

Liz


Re: no squeeks    11:28 on Saturday, September 20, 2003          
(Andrew)
Posted by Archived posts

Dominants are very good for cheaper insturments becuase the bring out a louder sound, and project the violin more.


Re: no squeeks    12:01 on Saturday, September 20, 2003          
(ben)
Posted by Archived posts

excuse me elizabeth ward, but my violin aint chinese, how wud u ne way


Re: no squeeks    12:03 on Saturday, September 20, 2003          
(Elizabeth Ward)
Posted by Archived posts

That is true, but a) they take ages before they stay in tune, b) they are not designed to be used with adjusters or metal tailpieces (though I know some do manage this) c) a set costs more than half as much as the violin Ben bought d)they last about two weeks (or so it seemed to me when I used them!) .... I will readily agree that the tone is hard to beat.

Synoxas are a better bet, cheaper and last longer, but personally I`d go for dominants or Crystals depending on how bright the violin is.


Re: no squeeks    12:05 on Saturday, September 20, 2003          
(Elizabeth Ward)
Posted by Archived posts

O sorry, Ben, I must have got you mixed up with someone else. There was a beginner on here a few weeks ago who bought a Cheap Chinese violin from ebay, I thought it was you. Sorry!

If you have a decent quality violin and can tune on the pegs alone then Eudoxas are indeed worth considering.

Liz


Re: no squeeks    12:07 on Saturday, September 20, 2003          
(Elizabeth Ward)
Posted by Archived posts

I just looked back, Ben, and you said you bought a Palatino. Or have you bought somethign different since?

Lzi


Re: no squeeks    10:07 on Wednesday, September 24, 2003          
(Martin Milner)
Posted by Archived posts

Unless two people can log on with the same username, then it was the same ben who had a palatino on 8th August and was advised to try dominant strings.


   




This forum: Older: El Tango de Roxanne from Moulin Rouge for violin?
 Newer: Nice article about violin strings