Does Size REALLY Matter?
20:30 on Saturday, January 7, 2006
|
|
|
(The Violist)
|
It`s sick, I know.
Besides volume, how do you think size affects a viola`s tone quality, if at all? Because to ME it always seems like the bigger the viola, the better the sound. Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Re: Does Size REALLY Matter?
21:54 on Saturday, January 7, 2006
|
|
|
(Viola14)
|
The larger the viola, the sound will be deeper and louder.
|
|
|
|
Re: Does Size REALLY Matter?
23:38 on Saturday, January 7, 2006
|
|
|
(Scotch)
|
As I mentioned in the "shifting" thread, if that viola were acoustically its proper size for its range it would be too large to play like a violin but still too small to play like a cello. Viola makers are still grappling with the solution to this problem, but the way things stand so far and as a general rule, the larger the viola the more it will properly resonate.
|
|
|
|
Erratum
23:43 on Saturday, January 7, 2006
|
|
|
(Scotch)
|
Re: "that viola".
I meant "the viola".
|
|
|
|
Re: Does Size REALLY Matter?
04:02 on Sunday, January 8, 2006
|
|
|
(Liz Ward)
|
Short answer, yes, but you have to weigh that against the fact that you have to be able to play it without doing yourself an injury!
Lzi
|
|
|
|
Re: Does Size REALLY Matter?
05:38 on Sunday, January 8, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Does Size REALLY Matter?
16:03 on Monday, January 9, 2006
|
|
|
(The Violist)
|
"Erratum" - that`s a classic.
Anyways, yes I know what Scotch is talking about. Like the bass, the viola was originally much larger than it is today. - So big, in fact, that many "normal"-sized people couldn`t play it. (For the record, there was once a string bass somewhere around 22 feet tall - that`s pretty big!)
In the early 1900`s (Scotch will correct me if I`m wrong here which I might be) they manged to shrink the viola down to a "playable" size.
Yet for some reason the violin still enjoys its blissful popularity...
I PREDICT THAT THERE MAY COME A DAY WHEN THE VIOLIN`S OLDER BROTHER WILL DOMINATE, AND THE FOUR-STRING`ED VIOLINSE WILL BE CAST IN SHADOWE! (As ambigious as Nostradamus, but unlike Nostradamus, this actually has some MEANING to it.)
|
|
|
|
16th century violas
10:28 on Tuesday, January 10, 2006
|
|
|
(Spock)
|
In the 16th century there were alto (small) violas and tenor (large) violas. The alto violas ranged in sizes from 15"-16" and the tenor from 17"-20" in size. By the 18th century most violas were small in size (14.5"-15.5"). Hector Berlioz referred to them as "bastard instruments." The tenor viola fell into favor again, but this time they were cut down in size to try to make them more playable, while still trying to retain their resonant sound.
|
|
|
|
Re: Does Size REALLY Matter?
21:18 on Friday, March 17, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Does Size REALLY Matter?
01:45 on Wednesday, March 22, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Does Size REALLY Matter?
10:04 on Monday, April 10, 2006
|
|
|
indi-viola-chic (3 points)
|
Posted by indi-viola-chic
to me, size does matter cuz i have been playing a 16 inch for 6 years..and a 15 inch does not beat it! The sound is deeper and louder.. Holla from NY!
|
|
|
|
Re: Does Size REALLY Matter?
16:24 on Tuesday, October 31, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Does Size REALLY Matter?
08:36 on Wednesday, November 1, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Does Size REALLY Matter?
17:00 on Monday, November 6, 2006
|
|
|
|