Violin to Viola?
00:54 on Wednesday, November 14, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Violin to Viola?
06:07 on Saturday, November 17, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Violin to Viola?
17:59 on Wednesday, November 21, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Violin to Viola?
02:47 on Saturday, November 24, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Violin to Viola?
02:50 on Saturday, November 24, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Violin to Viola?
17:22 on Wednesday, November 28, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Violin to Viola?
18:05 on Wednesday, November 28, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Violin to Viola?
03:21 on Tuesday, December 11, 2007
|
|
|
Re: Violin to Viola?
23:04 on Monday, December 17, 2007
|
|
|
esotericulist (2 points)
|
The viola is not used for virtuoso melodies as much, but many viola players (For example, Primrose) have transcribed the music 5 notes lower, so it's the same music, but a perfect 5th lower at all times.
In eastern european countries, the viola is considered (one of) the main instrument(s), much as the violin is in most other cultures.
The sound carries futher than a violin, and of course, it can go deeper, and doesn't have as much of a tinge to it's sound (we do not have an "e" string, and possibly because the strings are larger as well, as others are saying in this thread).
My viola teacher thinks the viola is harder (than the violin), as you have to put more effort to shift, hold on to your instrument, and get the full sound out of it.
|
|
|
|
|