Bundy 2 v.s. As300
17:39 on Sunday, November 20, 2005
|
|
 |
|
(SAXY ERIC)
|
Which is better
|
|
|
|
Re: Bundy 2 v.s. As300
14:38 on Monday, November 21, 2005
|
|
|
|
(Wildband)
|
bundyII is a student horn, as 300 is the selmer usa right? that`d be better, a intermeditate horn if i`m correct
|
|
|
|
Re: Bundy 2 v.s. As300
15:58 on Monday, November 21, 2005
|
|
|
|
(SAXY ERIC)
|
Thanks for answering a kid keeps saying my as300 sucks and hehas a bundy 2
|
|
|
|
Re: Bundy 2 v.s. As300
20:08 on Monday, November 21, 2005
|
|
|
|
(meyer5guy)
|
yeah I have a sky saxophone a cheapy saxophone but If I play good nobody says anything just play good dont worry about whos sax is better.
|
|
|
|
Re: Bundy 2 v.s. As300
16:57 on Tuesday, November 22, 2005
|
|
|
|
(SAXY ERIC)
|
thanks u have a good point
|
|
|
|
Re: Bundy 2 v.s. As300
19:51 on Tuesday, November 22, 2005
|
|
|
|
(Wildband)
|
yeah, i played a sky, and it had real bad intonation, and took a bit to get tused to blowing on, but since i play soprano i could tune it and it still wasn`t a bad sax. The player makes the horn, not the sax. As proved by my latest tryouts. The guy who beat me had a olds, a solid intermediate horn that cost maybe 1K or so. I had a 3.8K keilwerth shadow, one of the best saxes on the market, and the best keilwerth offers, and he beat me. by only 8 points, but still. haha.
|
|
|
|
|
