Composer very confused!
08:15 on Saturday, January 28, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Composer very confused!
18:07 on Saturday, January 28, 2006
|
|
|
Rachel (7 points)
|
I would definently prefer reading treble cleff. In fact I`ve never read a piece of music for the horn that is not in treble cleff!
And I would much read accidentals than the signature. But thats just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
Re: Composer very confused!
04:28 on Sunday, January 29, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Composer very confused!
04:56 on Sunday, January 29, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Composer very confused!
15:55 on Saturday, March 4, 2006
|
|
|
fish88girl (19 points)
|
For me, it depends on how low you go. Treble clef is best most of the time, but if you have to use a ton of ledger lines to show some of the lower notes, I'd rather have it switch to bass clef for those measures and then switch back.
For transposing, a piano's Bb is a horn's F.
Accidentals vs. Key signiture depends on what key you write it in. I'd prefer to have it written with the key signature of the proper key with the accidentals written that are different instead of all of the accidentals written in. In other words, if you write the trumpet part in the key of C major, write the horn part in the key of F major with Bb in the key signature. Then if a note doesn't follw the key of F, write in the accidental. I've have only played one or two songs that were written with all accidentals and the instruments in whatever key the composer pleased, and that song was a nightmare for the longest time.
<Added>
I agree with Scotch's advice, all of this sounds more confusing in words that in really is. If you can get a horn player, you would be better off going through it with him/her, not just talking about it online.
|
|
|
|
Re: Composer very confused!
00:22 on Sunday, March 19, 2006
|
|
|
Re: Composer very confused!
15:47 on Wednesday, May 10, 2006
|
|
|
|