french horn comparisons.
14:43 on Wednesday, November 21, 2007
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
22:14 on Wednesday, November 21, 2007
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
09:40 on Thursday, November 22, 2007
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
19:29 on Thursday, November 22, 2007
|
|
|
mentalysound (28 points)
|
Well I'm 16. But I consider myself to have way more than sufficient air supply and lip control. I've been playing since I was 11 and have recently accomplished a 5 octave scale. I have a med hand size. I'm going to play professional one day so I want this horn to be something that I'll be more than satisfied later in my years. Tone is my biggest concern
if it's hard to play I'll learn so that's why I want a real good horn. I want it to last a real long time. And I would like to play in an orchestra.
I'm East coast but I'm curious of different sounds. thanks john
-Alexander
|
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
08:25 on Friday, November 23, 2007
|
|
|
JOhnlovemusic (1279 points)
|
Alexander,
Great answers. Based on your answers if you are not taking private lessons you should. If you are playing on the East coast the Hoyer would be great, the Berg is good also, and consider Paxman.
Listen to the orchestras in your area and see what sound you like. For example Cincinati Horns are playing with a brighter more assertive sound than they used to many years ago. A Conn 8D will not fit into their sound. You would need a Paxman or Berg Descant.
Go here and look up the orchestras you like the sound of.
http://www.hornplayer.net/sections.asp?country=USA
At 16 with theintent of going to college and going on professionaly there is no reason for you not to get into a professional level quality horn.
Conn's and Alexanders will give you the big dark tone.
Paxman's, Bergs, Hoyer, etc will give you more of the higher harmonics and make it sound a little brighter.
John
|
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
12:34 on Friday, November 23, 2007
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
15:59 on Friday, November 23, 2007
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
17:45 on Friday, November 23, 2007
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
19:38 on Friday, November 23, 2007
|
|
|
JOhnlovemusic (1279 points)
|
Those are good things to listen for.
Demo - don't plan on buying the day you go. You want to make sure that is the horn for you. Leave, try some others and see if the horn "haunts you". Try demoing at different stores. different stores have different brands. AND, if you pick one out you want that one, not anotherone of the same model.
Unless you truly know how to tune a horn this is where a professional is good. You want to tune the hron to itself and then see how intune the partials are. If you plan on doign it your self let me know and I will give you a quick lesson on how to tune a horn. But unless your embouchre is rock solid you can't truly do it right.
DO check Chromatic performance,and any note cracking, tone in all ranges, small dents and dings don't concern me so much. For your first horn they might. All my horns have been used and everyone loves the way they play.
You want to check for valve tighness (and actually you might want yours to leak a just a little bit).
You will want to play it with your main moutpiece and a couple of others. You will need to know if it is a morse taper or a european taper lead pipe - it will matter what mouthpiece you use in the future. You will want to know what harmonics are resonating. you will want to check all solder joints. thickness of bell, roundness of bell. alignment of rotary valves, alignment of the levers, seating of the rotor bearings, how does the metal respond to your type of articulation?
I will see if I can't put a list together in a word document for you next week when I get back from vacation.
john
|
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
07:54 on Saturday, November 24, 2007
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
23:31 on Wednesday, November 28, 2007
|
|
|
destined_to_fly_ 379
|
Posted by destined_to_fly_379
On single or double horns? Personally I think Yamaha is pretty good, but a bit pricey.. Try a Holton, Conn, or Selman. Good quality, much better price!
|
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
18:58 on Thursday, November 29, 2007
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
09:26 on Thursday, December 13, 2007
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
08:05 on Tuesday, January 15, 2008
|
|
|
germanhorn (3 points)
|
Hello from Germany!
I don't know that much about the US Horns (Conn etc.), because nearly no one plays them here. I can say one thing though: The most important thing is that the horn fits to you and you feel comfortable with it.
We hornists here in Germany all play German instruments, which are generally excellent, but pretty damn expensive. The Hoyer 801 (student horn for semi-pros) costs 3700€ or 5500$ here. That's the one I play and after a custom valve mechanic change I'm very satisfied with it. If I go studying horn in 2 years however I'd buy a better one. Considering that you want to go pro as well, I'd say you should buy the best there is. The Hoyer pro horns are quite good (at least the 4801 I played was), but Alexander and Engelbert-Schmid are in another league (mostly because of the price).
Alexander: The 103 is the classic with very sonourous and deep, classic sound, there are however some newer ones like the 403S, which is very easy to play. They cost 7000€ and 8000€, respectively. Note that the 103 is played by 80% of German pro hornists.
The Engelbert-Schmid horns are quite unknown outside Germany, but for example the New York Philharmonics Horns (Phil Myers etc.) play them. They are even more expensive than the Alexander, costing 9000€+, but are about the best crafted horns you can get. Every single horn is made completely by hand. They are considered very easy to play, yet have a noble and very good sound, for orchestra and especially for chamber music. On their website (www. http://www.corno.de/schmid/deu-eng/english.htm) there are some cool videos by Phil Myers and very much info about the horn.
The horns mentioned above are all double horns. If you want to go to a pro orchestra, you should consider buying a triple horn. They are far more expensive (12000€ for the Alexander 301, even more for the Engelbert-Schmid), but a large number of pro hornists (especially 1st and 3rd hornists) play them already. A triple has the advantage that you've always got a high-f horn just a click away for safe playing of very high passages.
Conclusion: Test and play as much different horns as you can and take some time for the decision!
|
|
|
|
Re: french horn comparisons.
09:57 on Wednesday, January 16, 2008
|
|
|
|