New or Old Alexander?
New or Old Alexander?
11:40 on Sunday, May 3, 2009
|
|
|
auroraflame (45 points)
|
Hi, haven't been on this forum for quite a while.
The horn I'm using now is a Hans Hoyer 4802 in unlacquered yellow brass, about 12 years old, that I've played for about a year and a half. Recently, my teacher has suggested that I probably need to change to an Alexander. She specifically said that a 403 would suit me better than a 103. Since I'm not all that familiar with Alex horns, what exactly is the the difference between these two models?
Anyway, I asked around and have a few horns that I can potentially try out. My question is, assuming that money is of no issue, would it be better to purchase a new or old Alex? To get a good new horn I will probably have to rely on connections to obtain one directly from Europe and I can't try it beforehand (the person choosing the horn is highly placed and very experienced though, totally reliable); the horn will also take a very long time to arrive. The great advantage is, of course, that the horn will be in mint condition when I start using it.
As for an old horn, I have a few choices available, even though they are all 103s. However, I'm worried about maintanence for the horns, since many are nearing 20 years in age. Of course the vast advantage is that I can change to the Alexander sooner, and also I can try out the horns myself.
So, which would be better, choosing a new or old instrument?
|
|
|
|
Re: New or Old Alexander?
13:49 on Sunday, May 3, 2009
|
|
|
Re: New or Old Alexander?
14:48 on Sunday, May 3, 2009
|
|
|
hanswurst (7 points)
|
I would also go for a used one.
The problem with Alexander could be that as you're in the US, you will have a hard time trying a few different horns. They will send you some, but I bet these horns won't be too good, as they will keep the good ones in germany, and/or for the pros.
I live in germany and went to Alexander one time to test a few horns, and if you're not a well-known pro, you won't even get to the room where the good ones are. So I could have chosen between some mediocre ones, and ended up with not buying a horn.
The problem with a used Alex (especially 103) could be that there are very few good ones for sale; if ones gets a great 103, he won't sell it. And as the 403 is quite new, there aren'T many on the 2nd hand market.
Anyway, for a close look of the 403, go here:
http://www.rimskys-horns.com/nl/Alex403MLK.html
Or even better to the Alex homepage:
http://www.gebr-alexander.de/
|
|
|
|
Re: New or Old Alexander?
23:34 on Sunday, May 3, 2009
|
|
|
Re: New or Old Alexander?
06:53 on Monday, May 4, 2009
|
|
|
hanswurst (7 points)
|
Wow, I would like to be on a school where Alex horns just lie around!
Guess the gigbag problem won't be the main reason not to get a 403. Just send Alexander an email and ask which gigbags can be used for that horn, as they normally use the MB bags too.
The 200 is basically the same as the 1103, the main difference is the Schmetterkranz of nickel silver. Guess the difference between the 200 and the 103 (or 403) is the typical difference between Kruspe and Geyer wrap horns. As long as you don't plan to play in a german pro orchestra (where you just have to play a 103), you could get the 200.
|
|
|
|
Re: New or Old Alexander?
17:11 on Monday, May 4, 2009
|
|
|
Re: New or Old Alexander?
20:06 on Monday, May 11, 2009
|
|
|
Re: New or Old Alexander?
02:01 on Tuesday, May 12, 2009
|
|
|
Re: New or Old Alexander?
14:44 on Friday, May 15, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|